I guess when the class is not in the classpath of the Ignite node :) To
deserialize the value, either
 * the class should be either in the classpath
 * or it should be accessible via the configured class loader
 * or optimized marshaller should be used and peer class loading is enabled.

2017-03-24 12:02 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>:

> Alexey, one more question.
>
> In which cases, classLoader won't find Class by class-name?
>
> 2017-03-24 10:00 GMT+03:00 Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Vyacheslav,
> >
> > As for the real scenarios for a class name not be registered, this can
> > happen when Ignite attempts to register a mapping on a locked topology
> (for
> > example, inside a started user transaction) and the primary node for the
> > corresponding mapping key has left. In this case, the mapping attempt
> would
> > throw a topology exception, and marshaller has to write the full class
> > name.
> >
> > --AG
> >
> > 2017-03-23 22:20 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko <
> > alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi Vyacheslav,
> > >
> > > 1: Yes, exactly.
> > >
> > > 2: Hash code is written for all BinaryObjects. Starting with Ignite
> > > 1.9, hashCode implementations of original classes are never used to
> > > compute hash codes for corresponding binary objects.
> > >
> > > - Alex
> > >
> > > 2017-03-23 12:58 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>:
> > > > Following second question.
> > > >
> > > > In which cases it needs to write postWriteHashCode?
> > > >
> > > > 2017-03-23 12:27 GMT+03:00 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello everyone.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please, explain me, in which cases at marshalling after object
> header
> > > (24
> > > >> bytes) it needs to write Class.getName?
> > > >>
> > > >> I understand that it means that this class isn't registered in
> > > >> BinaryContext, and at deserializing we use it for loading Class with
> > > >> ClassLoader.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please explain real scenarios.
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Best Regards, Vyacheslav
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Vyacheslav
>

Reply via email to