Do we need to merge anything else to the master branch or you mean the enum was removed with the rest of the changes before and merged by Andrey G?
— Denis > On Mar 30, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com> wrote: > > + Denis > >> 30 марта 2017 г., в 12:14, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com >> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> написал(а): >> >> Denis, >> >> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum already removed. >> >>> 30 марта 2017 г., в 7:38, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org >>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> написал(а): >>> >>> Maxim, Andrey G., Igniters, >>> >>> What if go further and remove CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum from the >>> public API at all? I see no sense to keep it for the only one option left - >>> PRIMARY. >>> >>> Any objections? >>> >>> — >>> Denis >>> >>>> On Feb 27, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Kozlov Maxim <dreamx....@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:dreamx....@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Igniters, >>>> >>>> After remove CLOCK mode, CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum contains now only >>>> one value PRIMARY. Andrey Gura, proposition remove >>>> CacheAtomicWriteOrderMode enum. Will there be something special for this >>>> purpose is enum? >>>> >>>> jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4587>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Max K. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Max K. >> >> >> >> > > -- > Best Regards, > Max K. > > > >
