On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Sergi Vladykin <sergi.vlady...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That API always was a big mistake. I'm for removing it completely. > Sergi, I share your sentiment for cleaning up. But we cannot allow ourselves such radical changes given that we have a fairly large user base already. Deprecating it seems like a safer approach for now. > > Sergi > > 2017-04-14 18:01 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > > What is this obsession with breaking stuff? Let's deprecated it, it is a > > big change on API. > > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > As you know we reworked our async API and added paired asynchronous > > methods > > > instead of using IgntieAsyncSupport infrastructure. Now our API is > clean > > > and straightforward. > > > > > > However, we didn't remove IgntieAsyncSupport, but deprecated it as user > > > impact might be huge. Now I think that may be ... may be it is better > to > > > remove it right now thus forcing users to migrate to better API > quicker? > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > >
