On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 6:28 AM, ezhuravl <e.zhuravlev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Folks, > > I've started working on a https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/IGNITE-5836 > ticket and found that the recently added feature with cacheGroups doing > pretty much the same that was described in this issue. CacheGroup > guarantees > that all caches within a group have same assignments since they share a > single underlying 'physical' cache. > > I think we can return FairAffinityFunction and add information to its > Javadoc that all caches with same AffinityFunction and NodeFilter should be > combined in cache group to avoid a problem with inconsistent previous > assignments. > > What do you guys think? > Are you suggesting that we can only reuse the same FairAffinityFunction across the logical caches within the same group? This would mean that caches from the different groups cannot participate in JOINs or collocated compute. I think I like the idea, however, we need to make sure that we enforce this restriction, at least at the SQL JOIN level. Alexey G, Val, would be nice to hear your thoughts on this. > > Evgenii > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite- > developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Resurrect-FairAffinityFunction- > tp19987p20669.html > Sent from the Apache Ignite Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
