Hello Valentin, The application you are probably referring to is user code from Stack Overflow and its license is uncertain.
Moreover, this will require depending our tests on spring-mvc and spring-security. If that is acceptable, I could throw together a clean room implementation. But I still think it tests too little for too much effort. What do you think? Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev 2017-09-13 2:33 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko <[email protected] >: > Ilya, > > I see you have a fully-pledged application to test the scenario. Is it > possible to include it (probably simplified a bit) into our tests suites so > that it runs periodically? This will not only verify this particular fix, > but also prevent us from other issues that may occur. > > -Val > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Val, can you please help? > > > > --Yakov > > > > 2017-09-12 14:30 GMT+03:00 Ilya Kasnacheev <[email protected]>: > > > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > > > It came to our attention that our handling of Web Sessions is > > inconsistent: > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45648884/apache- > > > ignite-spring-secutiry-error > > > > > > I've filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6070 and fixed > > the > > > issue in https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/2621 (amended tests > pass) > > > > > > Please step forward to review and possibly merge this change, as I > could > > > not locate any commiters familiar with Web Sessions directly. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > >
