> that all the SQL related pages will be hidden Denis, please make sure to update all references to these pages. It should be obvious from Java/.NET/C++ docs that SQL features are present and did not disappear from the docs.
Consider scenario: As a user, I go to apacheignite-net.readme.io and search for SQL and LINQ (in the search bar). Do I find anything? Thanks, Pavel On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > On Thursday, October 19, 2017, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Denis, > > > > Awesome work and great contribution! > > > > A minor comment. Does SELECT belong under DML? > > > Thanks for feedback! > > It turned out that yes, SELECT belongs to DML. Personally, I deciphered ‘M’ > as ‘modification’ before while in fact it stands for ‘manipulation’. > > Some proof links: > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_manipulation_language > http://www.h2database.com/html/grammar.html > > Denis > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > I’m glad to share that the new SQL doc is ready for proof read: > > > https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs > > > > > > Main sections: > > > - Overview - SQL capabilities outline and getting started guide. > > > - SQL Reference - SQL itself with all the commands and operations. > > > - Architecture - insights on how SQL engine works and some of its > > features. > > > - JDBC > > > - ODBC > > > - Tools and Analytics - tools to work with Ignite as with SQL database. > > > - Java Dev Guide - Java specific features > > > - .NET Dev Guide - .NET specific features > > > - C++ Dev Guide - C++ specific features > > > > > > Note, that all the SQL related pages will be hidden (consider removed) > on > > > Java, .NET and C++ readme.io sites in 2.3. All the SQL related > > > capabilities have to be documented on this new specific doc. > > > > > > Here is we’re tracking minor documentation tasks to close before the > > > release: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6685 > > > > > > Many thanks to Sergey Puchnin for the help with SQL reference > > > documentation! > > > > > > — > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 14, 2017, at 5:00 AM, Serge Puchnin <sergey.puch...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Denis, > > > > Thanks a lot for the link. > > > > It's very helpful to split "function part" to more specific like > > > 'string', > > > > 'numeric', etc. > > > > > > > > the main reason to separate "Java Developer" as an independent part > > > because > > > > it's about a mix between Java and SQL code. > > > > It's about classes, methods, annotation, GC, etc. > > > > It doesn't fully belong to the SQL specification but IMHO should be > in > > > SQL > > > > category. > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Serge > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 at 22:39, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Serge, > > > >> > > > >> I like the proposed format. It reminds me the one chosen by MemSQL > > which > > > >> is crystal clear: > > > >> https://docs.memsql.com/sql-reference/v5.8/sql-reference-overview/ > > > >> > > > >> Not 100% sure about “Java Developer Guides” section. Let me > > contemplate > > > a > > > >> bit and propose other solutions. > > > >> > > > >> — > > > >> Denis > > > >> > > > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:41 AM, Serge Puchnin < > sergey.puch...@gmail.com > > <javascript:;>> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I have done some reorganizing for the SQL documentation. > > > >> Thanks a lot for the review and proof read. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 at 01:22, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > dsetrak...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Thanks Sergey, I think we should add SQL Syntax section on the > left. > > > Also, > > > >>> please let us know when we can proof read it. I would like to fix > > some > > > >>> phrasing on the page. > > > >>> > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Serge Puchnin < > > > sergey.puch...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> I've added a page for SQL language, create index statement and > Upper > > > >>>> function as an example for the new format: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/v2.1/docs/create-index > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> For me, it'd be OK to add a separate page for each SQL statement. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> BR, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Serge > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 at 02:19, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Please check you inbox. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> — > > > >>>>> Denis > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Sep 8, 2017, at 3:38 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > > >>> dsetrak...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Denis, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Can you please add me as an admin to that site? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> D. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Igniter (especially those who are willing to work on the new > SQL > > > >>> doc), > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> The doc for SQL capabilities has been set up. Copy pasted all > the > > > >>> SQL > > > >>>>>>> materials we have there: > > > >>>>>>> https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs < > > https://apacheignite-sql. > > > >>>>>>> readme.io/docs> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sergey P., feel free to start reworking the doc according to > the > > > >>> new > > > >>>>>>> proposed format. Don’t hesitate removing outdating or > misleading > > > >>>>> content. > > > >>>>>>> If you’re uncertain about something just send us a message > here. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Presently the doc is not indexed by searching engines. Let’s > > > >>> finish it > > > >>>>>>> first and announce afterwards. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> — > > > >>>>>>> Denis > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > > >>>> dsetrak...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Denis Magda < > > dma...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Serge, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Undoubtedly, I like this format. I’ve created a new > > documentation > > > >>>>> domain > > > >>>>>>>>> for all our SQL capabilities: > > > >>>>>>>>> https://apacheignite-sql.readme.io/docs < > > > >>> https://apacheignite-sql. > > > >>>>>>>>> readme.io/docs> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Once I get an open source license for it we can start moving > > the > > > >>>>>>> existing > > > >>>>>>>>> docs and create the new there. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Sounds good. We should make sure that we do not "move" the > > > >>>>> documentation, > > > >>>>>>>> we should "copy" it. Otherwise we will get 404 errors in > google. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> — > > > >>>>>>>>> Denis > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 30, 2017, at 4:38 AM, Serge Puchnin n < > > > >>>>> sergey.puch...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Sorry for inconvenience! > > > >>>>>>>>>> there is a link for a sample: > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B-s4Ivq- > > > >>>>>>> lrPobzZ4c2Y1X1ZLcWhGenE4TllVM3 > > > >>>>>>>>> VlODhtT2Iw > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Serge > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 29 Aug 2017, at 19:30, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org > > <javascript:;>> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Serge, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The attachment is missing. Try to share it via google drive > > or > > > >>>> other > > > >>>>>>>>> storage. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> — > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 2:38 AM, Serge Puchnin < > > > >>>>> sergey.puch...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi ! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As I can see, there is some room for documentation > > > >>> improvement. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> As a sample of documentation, I've prepared a description > of > > > >>>>> "CREATE > > > >>>>>>>>> INDEX" statement. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> What’s your opinion? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> What can be improved? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> What should be added? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Serge > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
