This may be related to the recent changes in TC infrastructure. I see the
following in remote nodes output:

nohup: ignoring input
/data/teamcity/work/820be461cd64b574/bin/ignite.sh, ERROR:
The version of JAVA installed in JAVA_HOME= is incorrect.
Please point JAVA_HOME variable to installation of JDK 1.7 or JDK 1.8.
You can also download latest JDK at http://java.com/download


Sergey, Petr, can you take a look?

2017-12-15 15:23 GMT+03:00 Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>:

> According to Failure Conditions [1] — it is designed to fail after 30 min.
> So the question is - should we consider 30 min run time to be project’s
> error (and fix the code) or TeamCity error (and fix the build configuration
> by, for example, increasing build failure timeout)?
>
>
> [1] https://ci.ignite.apache.org/admin/editBuildFailureConditions.
> html?id=buildType:Ignite20Tests_IgniteStartNodes <
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/admin/editBuildFailureConditions.
> html?id=buildType:Ignite20Tests_IgniteStartNodes>
>
>
> > On 15 Dec 2017, at 14:50, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Igniters,
> >
> > Who can became Jedi of TeamCity and substitute me in this research?
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Dmitry Pavlov
> >
> > пт, 15 дек. 2017 г. в 12:38, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com
> >:
> >
> >> Dmitry,
> >>
> >> Could you please investigate?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Andrey Kuznetsov <stku...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Anton,
> >>>
> >>> I doubt it was merge conflict. Couple of days ago 'Ignite Start Nodes'
> >>> suite succeeded 1 time after unrelated changes, and now it is failing
> >>> again.
> >>>
> >>> 2017-12-12 16:25 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com
> >:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Seems we have merge conflict.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=Ignite20Tests_
> >>>> IgniteStartNodes&tab=buildTypeHistoryList&branch_
> >>>> Ignite20Tests=%3Cdefault%3E
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>  Andrey Kuznetsov.
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to