Val, Yes, the entries will be removed from both memory and persistence.
2018-03-12 19:20 GMT+03:00 Valentin Kulichenko < valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com>: > Alex, > > What is behavior going to be after IGNITE-5874 is fixed? Will expired entry > be removed from both memory and persistence? > > -Val > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:06 AM, Alexey Goncharuk < > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The ticket [1] is in patch available state looks good, the only thing > left > > there is to transfer old entries to new storage. I hope Andrey will have > > time to finish this soon, so we can target the fix for 2.5. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5874 > > > > 2018-03-09 22:51 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > Val, > > > > > > I'd like to hear Alexey G. opinion on this? Alex, please chime in. > > > > > > In general, the more deployments the persistence will get the more > demand > > > we will see for that capability. Personally, I'd create a ticket for > now > > > and put it off to our backlog. > > > > > > -- > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:43 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > As far as I know there is no plans. Denis please correct me if I'm > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > > > But users found these or similar bugs, it seems we need to support > > PDS > > > > and > > > > > TTL. > > > > > > > > > > > > > We should either support it or throw a clear exception on startup > > > clearly > > > > stating that it is not. I suppose, it should be the latter for now. > > > > Dmitriy, any chance you can file a ticket for it? > > > > > > > > > >
