The latest 2.4 documentation is now available on readme.io  -
https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/

-Prachi

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
wrote:

> NuGet packages uploaded: https://www.nuget.org/packages?q=Apache.Ignite
>
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:54 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Correct, it is a matter of time. Download links already work on my side
> > [1].
> >
> > [1] http://mirror.linux-ia64.org/apache/ignite/2.4.0/
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Link to 2.4.0 is pointing to RBC mirror, not Apache Dist itself.
> > >
> > > I do not know how often RBC updates its mirror, but I think we have to
> > > devise better solution for pointing to fresh release artifacts.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 12 Mar 2018, at 13:24, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Vladimir,
> > > >
> > > > I see the link for 2.4.0 on https://ignite.apache.org/
> > > download.cgi#binaries,
> > > > but it does not work.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > voze...@gridgain.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Correction: " Apache Ignite *2.4.0* release (RC1) has been
> accepted."
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> > voze...@gridgain.com
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Igniters,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Apache Ignite 2.3.0 release (RC1) has been accepted.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 5 "+1" binding votes received:
> > > >>> - Alexey Goncharuk
> > > >>> - Alexey Kuznetsov
> > > >>> - Anton Vinogradov
> > > >>> - Denis Magda
> > > >>> - Pavel Tupitsyn
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vote thread:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> *http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >> com/VOTE-Apache-Ignite-2-4-0-RC1-td27687.html
> > > >>> <http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > >> com/VOTE-Apache-Ignite-2-4-0-RC1-td27687.html>*
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Ignite 2.4.0 will be released soon.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Vladimir.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to