On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:45 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Yakov, > > Thread-per-partition is hardly applicable for general SQL use case as user > operates on arbitrary data sets. But in general we may track size deltas > for partitions on transaction level. If transaction span one or several > partitions, we may hold this data in a single long or Map. If transaction > spans a lot of partitions, we may store this data in array. > > What do you think? > Vova, I think you are suggesting maintaining the size as you go. This does sound like a right approach, assuming that it does not carry noticeable overhead. D.
