TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder can be configured with 127.0.0.1. Example with remote nodes will work fine on a single machine. Users rarely run examples on multiple machines.
чт, 19 июля 2018 г. в 5:30, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > I am confused, the TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder will only discover nodes with > specified list of IPs. Don't we have examples that require remote nodes to > join? > > D. > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Stanislav Lukyanov < > stanlukya...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > It can seem not important, but saves a minute for everyone. > > No, it actually does seem important when you think about it :) Thanks for > > the suggestion. > > Let me correct this then. > > > > The issue is > > IGNITE-6826: Change default DiscoverySpi ipFinder type for examples > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6826 > > It is about changing the ipFinders used in the Ignite examples from > > TcpDiscoveryMulticastIpFinder to TcpDiscoveryVmIpFinder. > > > > Thanks, > > Stan > > > > From: Dmitry Pavlov > > Sent: 18 июля 2018 г. 17:30 > > To: dev@ignite.apache.org > > Cc: antkr....@gmail.com; somefire...@gmail.com; ptupit...@apache.org > > Subject: Re: Pushing IGNITE-6826 forward > > > > Hi Stanislav, > > > > I wish this push will have effect. > > > > Just two proposals that will help Igniters to easily jump into such > emails: > > 1. Include ticket short description into subject, not only number. > > 2. Include link to JIRA issue into body so it could be easily clicked to > > find out details. > > It can seem not important, but saves a minute for everyone. > > > > Sincerely, > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > ср, 18 июл. 2018 г. в 16:32, Stanislav Lukyanov <stanlukya...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > Hi Igniters, > > > > > > There is a small but annoying issue with examples using > MulticastIpFinder > > > by default. > > > The JIRA is IGNITE-6826. > > > > > > AntonK and DmitriiR have suggested PRs to fix this, but PavelT had some > > > concerns and the fix stuck as the result. > > > > > > Pavel, could you please suggest necessary changes to the PRs so that > guys > > > can move forward with integration? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Stan > > > > > > > >
