Agree, this should be a great performance boost. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ivan, > > I agree that providing WAL pointer is the better option. Initially, > Standalone WAL iterator was developed for debugging utility, so a set of > files was perfectly OK. > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Palov > > ср, 15 авг. 2018 г. в 20:06, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>: > > > Igniters, > > > > Right now we are developing WAL shipping process for our internal > > purposes and we use StandaloneWalRecordsIterator to read WAL files from > > custom destination. We have bumped into a problem - iterator can be > > constructed from set of files and dirs, but there's no option to pass > > WAL pointer to the iterator factory class to start iteration with. It > > can be worked around (by filtering all records prior to needed pointer), > > but I think it would be handy to add such option to > > IgniteWalIteratorFactory API. > > > > What do you think? > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > Ivan Rakov > > > > >