Agree, this should be a great performance boost.

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ivan,
>
> I agree that providing WAL pointer is the better option. Initially,
> Standalone WAL iterator was developed for debugging utility, so a set of
> files was perfectly OK.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dmitriy Palov
>
> ср, 15 авг. 2018 г. в 20:06, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Igniters,
> >
> > Right now we are developing WAL shipping process for our internal
> > purposes and we use StandaloneWalRecordsIterator to read WAL files from
> > custom destination. We have bumped into a problem - iterator can be
> > constructed from set of files and dirs, but there's no option to pass
> > WAL pointer to the iterator factory class to start iteration with. It
> > can be worked around (by filtering all records prior to needed pointer),
> > but I think it would be handy to add such option to
> > IgniteWalIteratorFactory API.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Ivan Rakov
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to