Hi Pavel,

Thank you for noticing and bringing it here. I've fixed TC failure.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

чт, 16 авг. 2018 г. в 0:10, Pavel Pereslegin <xxt...@gmail.com>:

> Hello Igniters.
>
> It seems that "idea/ignite_inspections.xml" should be excluded from
> "check-licenses" maven profile, because "_Licenses Headers_"
> configuration always fails now [1] on TeamCity.
>
> [1]
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_LicensesHeaders&tab=buildTypeHistoryList&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=%3Cdefault%3E
> ср, 15 авг. 2018 г. в 20:49, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>:
> >
> > I've updated wiki page
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Coding+Guidelines#CodingGuidelines-C.CodeInspection
> > with
> > reference to settings.xml placement in the project.
> >
> > It is only advice, so I hope you don't mind having this reference.
> >
> > ср, 15 авг. 2018 г. в 16:45, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Hi Maxim,
> > >
> > > Thank you for stepping in. I've committed the first version here
> > > 'idea/ignite_inspections.xml'. We can move it to project default later
> when
> > > all inspection problems are fixed.
> > > Commit:
> > >
> > >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ignite.git;a=commit;h=3e0f04edf7cc0aa1631fbd1b9af1e9b87b697eb1
> > >
> > >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > you can enable this profile using the following steps: Inspections
> > > (icon)->Configure inspections->(settings button)->Import
> Profile->select
> > > file and import.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >
> > > вт, 14 авг. 2018 г. в 16:31, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >> Dmitry and other Igniters,
> > >>
> > >> Previously you has suggested to commit `Code Inspections` into Ignite
> > >> codebase.
> > >> It makes sense for me. I think it's the easiest way to share this
> profile
> > >> among community
> > >> members and this inspection can be set as for the project level.
> > >> So, I suggest:
> > >>
> > >> 1) According to Jetbrains documentation [1] the inspection profile
> can be
> > >> placed to
> > >> `<project>/.idea/inspectionProfiles` with name `Project_Default.xml`
> > >> (hope most of us using IDEA for development)
> > >> This allows enable this profile automatically on per project level and
> > >> will
> > >> simplify
> > >> development process according to rules accepted by our community.
> > >>
> > >> 2) I can file tickets and do some of them to fix inspection failures
> which
> > >> Alexey mentioned
> > >> earlier. Hope other members of community will help me with it.
> > >>
> > >> 3) I think `Inspections (Core)` TeamCity can be triggered as nightly
> build
> > >> as it takes more
> > >> than 4 hours. Suppose, inspection build in each PR is not the best
> way in
> > >> our case. New run
> > >> here [2].
> > >>
> > >> 4) We can tune our MTCGA.Bot to notify members with new inspection
> > >> failures
> > >> added by them.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Also, I've taken Alexey's inspection file as an example, I’ve checked
> what
> > >> we already discussed
> > >> previously (e.g. `Anonymous class can be converted to lambda` should
> be
> > >> disabled by default)
> > >> and added these additional rules to it:
> > >>  - General | Line is longer than allowed by code style
> > >>  - Java | Code maturity | Call to 'printStackTrace()'
> > >>  - Java | Code style issues | Unnecessary 'null' check before
> 'equals()'
> > >> call
> > >>
> > >> If we decide to proceed I will attach this file to JIRA.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/code-inspection.html
> > >> [2]
> > >>
> > >>
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_InspectionsCore&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=pull%2F3710%2Fhead
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 16:19 Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Dmitriy Govoruknin,
> > >> >
> > >> > It seems there is a lack of volunteers to apply code inspections to
> our
> > >> CI
> > >> > & patch submission process. Probably we could come back to your
> > >> > initial idea about setting up inspection locally.
> > >> >
> > >> > Could you commit or share your IDEA inspection settings? I could
> apply
> > >> it
> > >> > at least on my machine and remove odd warning types one by one.
> What do
> > >> you
> > >> > think?
> > >> >
> > >> > Sincerely,
> > >> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >> >
> > >> > сб, 4 авг. 2018 г. в 1:22, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Ideally, I should not asking for people to solve something for me.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I just want this idea did not disappear from our radar.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > пт, 3 авг. 2018 г. в 23:47, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> dsetrak...@apache.org
> > >> >:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 7:49 AM, Dmitriy Pavlov <
> > >> dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > >> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > I understand it is not so Apache-way from my side to ask
> > >> volunteers to
> > >> > >> do
> > >> > >> > some things (instead of contributing it by myself).
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> Dmitriy, I am not sure why you feel this is not the Apache way.
> No
> > >> one
> > >> > can
> > >> > >> do everything themselves.  You should absolutely keep recruiting
> more
> > >> > >> volunteers from the community.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> D.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> --
> > >> --
> > >> Maxim Muzafarov
> > >>
> > >
>

Reply via email to