Hi Alex, Thanks for the ideas! It will be useful. However, from my side, Oracle like syntax looks excess. Will be good if someone else say opinion opinion about syntax.
Igniters, what do you think which syntax of Ignite management via SQL will be prefer? пт, 9 нояб. 2018 г. в 0:37, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>: > Yuri, > > I think it will be useful if we extend in future management via SQL tool to > cover not only queries but also other parts of Ignite (for example: for > canceling tasks, for killing transactions, activation/deactivation, > baseline topology change, etc.). > > Maybe, in this case, we should use a common prefix for such management > commands (like Oracle do: "ALTER SYSTEM ...")? > > Something like: > ALTER GRID KILL QUERY ... [ON NODE ...] > ALTER GRID KILL TRANSACTION ... [ON NODE ...] > ALTER GRID ACTIVATE > etc. > > What do you think about it? > > > чт, 8 нояб. 2018 г. в 0:06, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > Yuri, > > > > That's an excellent idea, thank you for driving it. > > > > What is not explained is how to leverage from all that stat. For > instance, > > how can I know a total number of SELECTs, or a total number of SELECTs > > happened yesterday for specific data sets. Do believe that it's feasible > > and just not covered. > > > > -- > > Denis > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:01 AM Юрий <jury.gerzhedow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Igniters! > > > > > > I think we can improve Ignite management and monitoring instruments > > related > > > to SQL. > > > I've prepared draft of IEP-29: SQL management and monitoring > > > < > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-29%3A+SQL+management+and+monitoring > > > > > > > . > > > > > > What do you think about it? May be do you have some additional > > suggestions? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Живи с улыбкой! :D > > > > > > -- Живи с улыбкой! :D
