Hi, As far as I remember zipkin defines tracing units in a current thread of execution. I cannot say for sure what goes wrong in your case. But it might be that traced execution on ser3 side switches from one thread to another and you see 2 units as a result.
чт, 14 мар. 2019 г. в 02:09, Aditya Kumar <adityaku...@fico.com>: > > > Hi Team, > > I was using ignite as dependecy in our application and was able to trace end > to end trace microservice calls. > Then, to let ignite handle our services in compute task, we removed all > spring-boot dependencies and created task for each service we had in our > microservice. > > The issue we are facing is explained using below POC done at our end. > > > We created a sample app where below things have been done and deployed in > ignite: > 1. created beans and interceptors needed to start and track zipkin and brave > trace > 2. craeted a task using org.apache.ignite.compute.ComputeTaskAdapter > 3. registered the task in the config file used while starting ignite server > > Below are the list of services(each service is exposing a REST endpoint) > created to test this scenario: > 1. ms1 (spring boot app) > 2. ser2 (spring mvc app having a rest endpoint to serve the incoming request) > 3. ser3 (spring mvc app using Ignite ComputeTaskAdapter to serve the incoming > request from '/ignite'. used ignite's ignite-rest-http.jar to enable > '/ignite' endpoint) > 4. ms4 (spring boot app) > 5. ms5 (spring boot app) > > Then, there were two scenarios of executions: > Case1. ms1 -> ser2 -> ms4 -> ms5 ==> we get single unit of traing in zipkin > from ms1 to ms5 (i.e. ms1 -> ser2 -> ms4 -> ms5) > Case2. ms1 -> ser3 -> ms4 -> ms5 ==> we get two unit of tracing in zipkin. > One is ms1 -> ser3 and another is ser3 -> ms4 -> ms5 > > I need to get single unit of tracing in zipkin using Case2 execution(i.e. as > we get in Case1) > > The sample app (ser3) is checked-in at > https://github.com/aditya2910/adzzz1/tree/master/ignite-rest-task > > Any help will be appreciated. > Please let me know incase you need any more info. > > Thanks, > Aditya > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, proprietary > and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please delete it immediately. -- Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin
