I think that we as the community should consider discontinuing the full-text search support. It goes with many limitations and not widely used. The market is flooded with many products designed for full-text search scenarios.
- Denis On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:44 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for keeping indexes as is. Moreover, sorry for off-topic Lucene is not > modular (Jigsaw-compliant), and having this dependency in ignite-indexing > make this jar also Java module - incompliant. > > ср, 20 мар. 2019 г. в 13:15, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>: > > > Hello, > > > > The link [1] is the issue with Persistence for text indices. > > > > AFAIK, the issue is very difficult with their implementation and has a > > doubtful performance improvement. One of the most obvious > > disadvantages of persisted Lucene indexes can be that they will > > dramatically slow down the node start time. So, probably, better to > > keep them in-memory only. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5371 > > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 12:31, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > - Lucene indexes are not persistent and there are currently no plans to > > > make them persistent. > > > - I could say more about that ticket have you actually linked to it. > > > > > > Regards, > > > -- > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > > > > ср, 20 мар. 2019 г. в 09:23, Tâm Nguyễn Mạnh < > nguyenmanhtam...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > > Hi Igniters, > > > > > > > > Since Ignite have native persistent option to store data into disk, > > but not > > > > text indexes. I saw this issue marked as Won't Fix. May I know the > > reason > > > > we are not going to store text indexes into disk for now ? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks & Best Regards > > > > > > > > Tam, Nguyen Manh > > > > > > >
