Hello, Petr. I think we should be specific here.
For me: "code style" fail should be equal to "compilation fail". Can you clarify, what fundamental tests you are written about? В Чт, 13/06/2019 в 11:26 +0300, Petr Ivanov пишет: > How about including basic set of tests (sanity checks) into ~Build Apache > Ignite~? > Or may be we can go even further and use cascade system of tests — run them > group by group, stopping the whole run if more fundamental tests are failing? > > > > On 12 Jun 2019, at 21:54, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > +1 for including checkstyl to "Build Apache Ignite". > > > > В Ср, 12/06/2019 в 21:29 +0300, Павлухин Иван пишет: > > > Maxim, > > > > > > Options 1 and 3 sounds fine to me. And taking into account current > > > state I tend to think that option 1 is even better. > > > > > > вт, 11 июн. 2019 г. в 14:19, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > Dmitry, > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > Sure, I'll not change anything on TC without discussion with all the > > > > community. > > > > > > > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 13:30, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Maxim, > > > > > > > > > > I've granted role Ignite Tests Admins to your account. Please check. > > > > > > > > > > Please notify community on any significant changes you do. > > > > > Unfortunately, > > > > > TC parameters audit is not so convenient as VCS-based > > > > > configuration/code. > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > пн, 10 июн. 2019 г. в 17:03, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to me that building [ignite-scalar] module under JDK9+ have > > > > > > been successfully solved for the ~Build Apache Ignite~ suite [1] [2] > > > > > > [3], but it was not configured for the [Check Code Style] suite. We > > > > > > should configure it the same way (but it sounds to me very odd). I > > > > > > see, that we have several options here: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Enable `checkstyle` profile for the ~Build Apache Ignite~ suite > > > > > > as > > > > > > we've discussed it previously [4] and forget about any duplicate > > > > > > configuration once and for all. One more thing to do so is that > > > > > > check > > > > > > style has been violated for a few days and nobody mentioned it [5]. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Since the checkstyle plugin is not related to scala-source code > > > > > > (it > > > > > > does not check it) we can exclude scala modules from maven build > > > > > > procedure for the checkstyle suite by adding some command-line > > > > > > parameters (test them locally, but have no TC permissions to check > > > > > > it > > > > > > on TC): > > > > > > -pl > > > > > > -:ignite-scalar_2.10,-:ignite-scalar,-:ignite-visor-console,-:ignite-visor-console_2.10 > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Configure [Check Code Style] the same way as ~Build Apache > > > > > > Ignite~ > > > > > > to support builds for JDK9+. > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > What options will be the best for the Apache Ignite? > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/scala/bug/issues/10871 > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6730 > > > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11189 > > > > > > [4] > > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Code-inspection-tp27709p41297.html > > > > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11899 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 15:36, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Petr. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at least Scala does not compile > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How cat I reproduce it? > > > > > > > Do we have ticket? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > В Пт, 07/06/2019 в 15:28 +0300, Petr Ivanov пишет: > > > > > > > > Suite fails because Apache Ignite compilation is not supported > > > > > > > > under > > > > > > > > > > > > JDK 9+ (at least Scala does not compile). > > > > > > > > Your build from [3] was triggered with JDK 11. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7 Jun 2019, at 14:57, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've noticed a few problems with Code Style Check Suite on TC > > > > > > > > > in the > > > > > > > > > master branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Some of the rules have been violated by previous commits > > > > > > > > > to the > > > > > > > > > master branch. I've created ticket [1] and have prepared PR > > > > > > > > > [2] which > > > > > > > > > is fixing it. > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, or maybe someone else, can you take a look, please? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. The Code Style Check Stuite still fails (time to time) on > > > > > > > > > TC with > > > > > > > > > compile error on [ignite-scalar] module > > > > > > > > > (java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/tools/ToolProvider). > > > > > > > > > For > > > > > > > > > instance, this build [3] fails and this is fully ok [4]. > > > > > > > > > However, the > > > > > > > > > ~Build Apache Ignite~ Suite with almost the same > > > > > > > > > configuration passes > > > > > > > > > normally. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to create a new suite with checkstyle for debug > > > > > > > > > purposes, > > > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > anyone grant permission to copy\clone\edit suites on TC? My > > > > > > > > > login: > > > > > > > > > maxmu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11899 > > > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6597 > > > > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4020653&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_CheckCodeStyle&tab=buildLog&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=%3Cdefault%3E > > > > > > > > > [4] > > > > > > > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4021372&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_CheckCodeStyle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
