Folks, it looks like I was overly optimistic with the estimates for the mentioned two tickets.
Dmitriy, Anton, Can you share your vision when the issues will be fixed? Perhaps, it makes sense to release 2.7.6 with the already fixed issues and schedule 2.7.7? Neither of them is a regression, so it's ok to release 2.7.6 as it is now. Thoughts? сб, 31 авг. 2019 г. в 11:37, Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>: > Yes, my bad, forgot to include the link. That's the one. > > пт, 30 авг. 2019 г. в 15:01, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>: > >> Alexey, >> >> Does the issue [1] is related to this [2] discussion on the user-list? >> If yes, I think it is very important to include these fixes to 2.7.6. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12127 >> [2] >> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Node-failure-with-quot-Failed-to-write-buffer-quot-error-td29100.html >> >> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Alexei Scherbakov >> <alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Alexey, >> > >> > Looks like important fixes, better to include them. >> > >> > пт, 30 авг. 2019 г. в 12:51, Alexey Goncharuk < >> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > > Igniters, >> > > >> > > Given that the RC1 vote did not succeed and we are still waiting for >> a few >> > > minor fixes, may I suggest including these two tickest to the 2.7.6 >> scope? >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12127 >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12128 >> > > >> > > The first one has been already reported on the dev-list [1], the >> second one >> > > may cause a state when an Ignite node cannot start on existing >> persisted >> > > data. Looking at the tickets, the fixes should be reasonably easy, so >> it >> > > should not shift 2.7.6 release timeline much. >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > > >> > > ср, 28 авг. 2019 г. в 15:25, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: >> > > >> > > > Separate repos for different Spark version is a good idea for me. >> > > > Anyway, can you help with Spark version migration, for now? >> > > > >> > > > В Ср, 28/08/2019 в 15:20 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет: >> > > > > Maybe the best solution today add for each new version of Spark >> the >> > > > > sub-module (Spark-2.3, Spark-2.4) or the separate repository with >> > > modules >> > > > > for each version or another way with separate repository and >> different >> > > > > branches like in >> > > https://github.com/datastax/spark-cassandra-connector >> > > > > >> > > > > 3 ways to support different versions with the different costs of >> > > support >> > > > > >> > > > > In the case of separate repository I could help, for example >> > > > > >> > > > > ср, 28 авг. 2019 г. в 14:57, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org >> >: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Hello, Alexey. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > But the >> > > > > > > compatibility with Spark 2.3 will be broken, isn't it? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Yes. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Do you have any >> > > > > > > plans to support the different version of Spark without >> loosing >> > > your >> > > > > > >> > > > > > unique >> > > > > > > expertise in Spark-Ignite integration? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > What do you mean by "my unique expertise"? :) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > How do you see support of several Spark version? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > В Ср, 28/08/2019 в 14:29 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет: >> > > > > > > Dear Nikolay Izhikov >> > > > > > > Are you going to update the Ignite-Spark integration for >> Spark 2.4. >> > > > But >> > > > > > >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > compatibility with Spark 2.3 will be broken, isn't it? Do you >> have >> > > > any >> > > > > > > plans to support the different version of Spark without >> loosing >> > > your >> > > > > > >> > > > > > unique >> > > > > > > expertise in Spark-Ignite integration? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > чт, 15 авг. 2019 г. в 14:54, Nikolay Izhikov < >> nizhi...@apache.org >> > > >: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hello, Igniters. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I try to upgrade Spark version but failed. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Seems, internal Spark API(External Catalog, SQL planner) >> that we >> > > > use >> > > > > > > > changed a lot. >> > > > > > > > So it will take some time to upgrade version. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > For now, I work hard to complete the second phase of IEP-35 >> so I >> > > > > > >> > > > > > postpone >> > > > > > > > upgrade Spark version to Ignite 2.8. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > В Чт, 15/08/2019 в 14:51 +0300, Dmitriy Pavlov пишет: >> > > > > > > > > Hi Denis, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Sure, since code freeze is planned for today, I don't >> mind to >> > > > include >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > this >> > > > > > > > > bug. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Ivan, could you complete this issue by 20 August? >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > BTW #1, Dmitriy Govoruchnin, please reply about commit for >> > > > > > > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953?src=confmacro >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > BTW #2, FYI, release page is now available here >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.7.6 >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > BTW #3, FYI, release related test PR is here >> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6775 and it's TC >> Bot >> > > > report is >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > here: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=ignite-2.7.6&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=ignite-2.7.6 >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > чт, 15 авг. 2019 г. в 13:55, Denis Magda < >> dma...@apache.org>: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > An Ignite user just reported a silly issue that needs >> to be >> > > > fixed >> > > > > > >> > > > > > in >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2.7.6: >> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12068 >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > More details and context: >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57479636/simple-select-query-missing-rows-in-ignite >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Ivan, please help us to make it to the release. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > - >> > > > > > > > > > Denis >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:47 AM Denis Magda < >> > > dma...@apache.org >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > IGNITE-12507 (Persistence files are stored to temp >> dir) has >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > definitely be >> > > > > > > > > > > added the scope and treated one of the main release >> > > drivers. >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, please let us know once the release wiki page >> is >> > > > ready so >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > that we >> > > > > > > > > > > can finalize the timelines based on chosen scope. >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > - >> > > > > > > > > > > Denis >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:12 PM Dmitriy Pavlov < >> > > > > > >> > > > > > dpav...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to everyone, who participated in the >> discussion. >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to wait also fix for >> > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12057 >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > and discussion results for that issue: >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/498a14b3971950a45ef57f45cc23d2438ce1afba000b586e230927bf@%3Cdev.ignite.apache.org%3E >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Since some issues are still open, we'll probably >> move >> > > some >> > > > > > >> > > > > > dates >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > forward, >> > > > > > > > > > > > but it seems we managed to discuss scope before >> scope >> > > > freeze. >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I consider now the scope is frozen - no new feature >> can >> > > be >> > > > > > >> > > > > > added >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > to the >> > > > > > > > > > > > scope of 2.7.6. We're entering the rampdown phase. >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, >> > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > See >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process >> > > > > > > > > > > > for >> > > > > > > > > > > > more details. >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 12 авг. 2019 г. в 16:37, Zhenya Stanilovsky >> > > > > > > > > > > > <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid >> > > > > > > > > > > > > : >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi al,, i also suggest to append [1], cause it >> could >> > > > produce >> > > > > > > > > > > > > CorruptedTreeException in some scenario. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12061 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we include >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12060 ? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > a >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:04 AM Nikolay Izhikov >> < >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > nizhi...@apache.org >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Deni. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nickolay, could you check if that's a quick >> > > > upgrade? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I will take a look. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > В Чт, 08/08/2019 в 11:08 -0700, Denis Magda >> пишет: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitry, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please add this BTree corruption fix to the >> > > scope: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11953 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Plus, I would upgrade our Spark integration >> to >> > > > version >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 2.4 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > as >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > long >> > > > > > > > > > > > as >> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.3 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > goes with limitations reported by our users: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12054 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nickolay, could you check if that's a quick >> > > > upgrade? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Denis >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:40 AM Dmitriy >> Pavlov < >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ivan, Ilya, Igniters, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like this release would be as >> minimal >> > > as >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > possible. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > According to dates proposed we could >> freeze >> > > > scope at >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 12.08, 4 >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > days >> > > > > > > > > > > > > is >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > than enough to stand up and say, ‘Hey, I >> have >> > > an >> > > > > > >> > > > > > urgent >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > fix’. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But >> > > > > > > > > > > > > it is >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also ok for me if we decide to have more >> > > relaxed >> > > > > > >> > > > > > dates. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For now, I suppose the following fixed >> should >> > > be >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > cherry-picked: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11767 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > (Blocker) >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GridDhtPartitionsFullMessage retains huge >> maps >> > > on >> > > > > > >> > > > > > heap in >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > exchange >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > history >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10451 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > (Major >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Bug) >> > > > > > > > > > > > > .NET: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Persistence does not work with custom >> affinity >> > > > > > >> > > > > > function >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9562 >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > (Critical >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Bug) >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Destroyed >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cache that resurrected on an old offline >> node >> > > > breaks >> > > > > > >> > > > > > PME >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I will continue to research JIRA. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 17:30, Павлухин Иван >> < >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > vololo...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > > > > > > : >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's the scope for this release? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same question. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand an idea of 2.7.6 >> release >> > > > > > >> > > > > > attracts me >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > because >> > > > > > > > > > > > > having >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a practice of doing frequent minor >> releases >> > > can >> > > > > > >> > > > > > help >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > us to >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > build >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reliable and predictable release rails. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 15:09, Ilya >> Kasnacheev < >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com >: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello! >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's the scope for this release? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > чт, 8 авг. 2019 г. в 15:07, Dmitriy >> Pavlov >> > > < >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > dpav...@apache.org >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > : >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Apache Ignite Developers, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We seem to be on the same page >> about 2.8 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > release, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > but >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > we’ve >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > started >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > practice - minor releases, the first >> > > > release >> > > > > > >> > > > > > was >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2.7.5. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > there is a couple of issues still >> not >> > > > fixed in >> > > > > > >> > > > > > that >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > release, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > so I >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like to propose to prepare one more >> minor >> > > > > > >> > > > > > release >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > for >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Apache >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ignite. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose my candidacy to be release >> > > > manager >> > > > > > >> > > > > > once >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > again. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I could (of course with help from >> Peter >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Ivanov) do >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > some >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > additional >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > efforts >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to complete and improve process doc >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose (most optimistic) dates >> for >> > > > release >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > stages: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scope Freeze: August 12, 2019 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Code Freeze: August 15, 2019 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Voting Date: August 22, 2019 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Release Date: August 27, 2019 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If nobody minds, I will create >> branch >> > > 2.7.6 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > based >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > on >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2.7.5 >> > > > > > > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set up >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the TC Bot during the weekend. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Zhenya Stanilovsky >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Alexei Scherbakov >> >
