Ilya, Yuriy,

It seems that text queries can return incorrect results on tologies
with MOVING partitions. I left a comment in JIRA [1].

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12401

пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в 15:00, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>:
>
> Ilya,
>
> I checked your test on a revision before "limit" and it fails there as
> well. Could you please double check?
>
> пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в 13:21, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > The problem is NOT specific to range queries. Range queries were broken
> > previously and they are broken now, but now even a simple "token in field
> > with limit" returns duplicates.
> >
> > Before limits were introduced, any tested use cases were unaffected by
> > duplicates, but now they are.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Ilya Kasnacheev
> >
> >
> > пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в 12:23, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > And is the problem specific to range queries or not?
> > >
> > > пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в 11:12, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Yuriy,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for investigating the problem [1]. Still cannot realize how
> > > > the problem relates to introduced "limit"? Is it right that there were
> > > > no duplicates before "limit" support? After that support is introduced
> > > > are only limited queries contain duplicates, or unlimited, or both?
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12401
> > > >
> > > > чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 18:30, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello!
> > > > >
> > > > > I have just found what I consider a major regression in Text Queries:
> > > it
> > > > > seems to me that text queries with limits will return same key-value
> > > > > entries multiple times.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please check the issue
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12401
> > > > > and corresponding build
> > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=4799634
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Ivan Pavlukhin



-- 
Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin

Reply via email to