Singe, no objections here -> feature merged to 2.8. On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 9:10 PM Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote:
> Good news, Anton! > > Thanks for your work on PME feature! > > > > 19 дек. 2019 г., в 21:00, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> написал(а): > > > > Folks, > > "2.8 + cherrypicked pme-free switch" vs "2.8" check finished, no blockers > > found. > > > https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7165%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead > > Any objections to merging? > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 4:20 PM Вячеслав Коптилин < > slava.kopti...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello Pavel, > >> > >> Good to hear from you! > >> > >>> I guess we should have a system property to have ability to turn off > PME > >> free switch behavior if something goes wrong after release. > >>> After feature battle testing we can remove it in the next release. > >> Sounds good to me. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> S. > >> > >> чт, 19 дек. 2019 г. в 15:59, Pavel Kovalenko <jokse...@gmail.com>: > >> > >>> Anton, Slava > >>> > >>> I guess we should have a system property to have ability to turn off > PME > >>> free switch behavior if something goes wrong after release. > >>> After feature battle testing we can remove it in the next release. > >>> > >>> чт, 19 дек. 2019 г. в 15:26, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > >>> > >>>> Slava, > >>>> > >>>>>> It would be nice to cut off a new branch from the release and run > >> all > >>>> the > >>>>>> tests with an integrated feature and after that, > >>>>>> if you don’t see new failures and the release engineer agrees with > >> the > >>>>>> result, then and only then this feature can be merged into the > >>> release. > >>>> I fully agree and see no other way to perform this. > >>>> PR already created and testing check scheduled. > >>>> > >>>> But, Maxim's proposal was to perform checks at the master branch > >>>> > >>>>>> 1. Merge the issue to the master branch. > >>>>>> 2. Wait for two-three weeks of running tests. > >>>>>> 3. Check that there are not flaky failures and fix them all > >> otherwise. > >>>>>> 4. Cherry-pick commit to the ignite-2.8 branch. > >>>> > >>>> and that's the point of discussion. > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:14 PM Вячеслав Коптилин < > >>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>>> We're releasing release branch, not master... why we're checking > >> the > >>>>> "wrong" branch? :) > >>>>>> Performing the release verification we're checking not only how > >>>> features > >>>>> work, but also how they work together. > >>>>> Yep, I agree that we should do verification for both branches of > >> corse. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Finally, my concerns mostly related to integration checks and fail > >>>>> hidings, not feature checks. > >>>>>> That's why I propose to start integration checks asap. > >>>>> IMHO, that is not the right way in order to handle such cases. > >>>>> Cherry-picking new features into the release branch directly without > >>> the > >>>>> integration branch is not about STABILITY (this is normal and > >>> acceptable > >>>> to > >>>>> cherry-pick obvious/trivial fixes into the release branch, though). > >>>>> It would be nice to cut off a new branch from the release and run all > >>> the > >>>>> tests with an integrated feature and after that, > >>>>> if you don’t see new failures and the release engineer agrees with > >> the > >>>>> result, then and only then this feature can be merged into the > >> release. > >>>>> > >>>>> This is my own view of the matter, and I do not insist that you > >> should > >>>> act > >>>>> in this way, but it seems to me that it would be safer and more > >>> correct. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> S. > >>>>> > >>>>> чт, 19 дек. 2019 г. в 14:20, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Feature already tested at the feature branch properly. > >>>>>> Question is about master -> release merge. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So: > >>>>>> 1) Testing at master does not equal to testing at release. > >>>>>> Code may fail in the master while it works at the release branch > >> and > >>>> vice > >>>>>> versa. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2) Master is flakier that release branch, so we able to miss > >> problem > >>>>> hidden > >>>>>> by other failures. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Summarizing, > >>>>>> We're releasing release branch, not master... why we're checking > >> the > >>>>>> "wrong" branch? :) > >>>>>> Performing the release verification we're checking not only how > >>>> features > >>>>>> work, but also how they work together. > >>>>>> We may have different race condition windows at different branched. > >>>>>> The bug may never happen at master, but happen each 50th check at > >>> 2.8, > >>>>> and > >>>>>> in case we'll delay feature merge and check 2.8 only 49 times > >> (while > >>> we > >>>>>> have 150+ successful checks at master) we gain false-negative case > >>> for > >>>>> 2.8. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Finally, my concerns mostly related to integration checks and fail > >>>>> hidings, > >>>>>> not feature checks. > >>>>>> That's why I propose to start integration checks asap. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 1:21 PM Вячеслав Коптилин < > >>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello Anton, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> We always have to merge all release features asap to have as > >> much > >>>>> time > >>>>>> as > >>>>>>> possible to fix all bugs. > >>>>>>> Could you please clarify this? What is the reason for that asap > >>>>> merging, > >>>>>>> especially the merging into the release branch? > >>>>>>> Why the testing cannot be done on the feature branch? You always > >>> have > >>>>> an > >>>>>>> ability to run RunAll/RunAllNightly builds on the feature branch > >>> and > >>>>> "fix > >>>>>>> all bugs". > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please don't get me wrong, I don't have objections/concerns > >> related > >>>> to > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>> 'pme-free-switch' feature itself. I do not quite understand the > >>>>>> motivation > >>>>>>> for that zerg rush. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> S. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ср, 18 дек. 2019 г. в 23:23, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sure, > >>>>>>>> You may count on my assistance in case of any problems. > >>>>>>>> We're both in the same boat. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> But I see no reason to delay the "pme-free switch" merge to > >> 2.8. > >>>>>>>> We always have to merge all release features asap to have as > >> much > >>>>> time > >>>>>> as > >>>>>>>> possible to fix all bugs. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I will replace the "feature activation version" with the > >>>>> "IgniteFeature > >>>>>>>> approach" according to your hint and merge it to master and 2.8 > >>>>> shortly > >>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>> case of no objections here. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 2:16 PM Maxim Muzafarov < > >>> mmu...@apache.org > >>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I have no objections. But I would like to count on your > >> support > >>>> in > >>>>>>>>> cases of any release-blocking issues. Can I? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Anton, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Let's do the following: > >>>>>>>>> 1. Merge the issue to the master branch. > >>>>>>>>> 2. Wait for two-three weeks of running tests. > >>>>>>>>> 3. Check that there are not flaky failures and fix them all > >>>>>> otherwise. > >>>>>>>>> 4. Cherry-pick commit to the ignite-2.8 branch. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> WDYT? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 09:26, Nikolay Izhikov < > >>>> nizhi...@apache.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1 to include PME free switch to 2.8 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 дек. 2019 г., 8:31 Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org > >>> : > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9913 > >>> (Pme-free > >>>>>>> switch) > >>>>>>>>> ready > >>>>>>>>>>> to be merged to master. > >>>>>>>>>>> How about to include it to the 2.8 too? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 3:31 PM Ivan Pavlukhin < > >>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I cherry-picked > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12424 > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8 branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 17 дек. 2019 г. в 15:23, Ivan Pavlukhin < > >>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding blocker tickets: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2176 -- > >>>> moved > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> next > >>>>>>>>>>>> version > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8552 -- > >>>> moved > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> next > >>>>>>>>>>>> version > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9489 -- > >>>> fixed > >>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>> scope of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another ticket > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2176 -- > >>>> Anton > >>>>>> K. > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> going > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to fix it in next few days > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 17 дек. 2019 г. в 13:30, Maxim Muzafarov < > >>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should cherry-pick this commit to the > >> ignite-2.8 > >>>>> branch > >>>>>>>> also. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you help with the release blocker issue > >> mentioned > >>>>>> above? > >>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> found the people who are assigned those issues. We > >>> need > >>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> clarify > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues status and ask for help if necessary. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 11:33, Ivan Pavlukhin < > >>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I merged a fix for thin JDBC default query > >> timeout > >>> to > >>>>>>> master > >>>>>>>>> under > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]. What should be the next steps with regard to > >>> 2.8 > >>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>> branch? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12424 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 12 дек. 2019 г. в 13:08, Maxim Muzafarov < > >>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here are the 2.8 release BLOCKER issues with > >>>> unknown > >>>>>>> status > >>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>> me. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone knows details can you share it? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-2176 [1] - Not valid exceptions in the > >>> case > >>>>> when > >>>>>>>>> example > >>>>>>>>>>>> can't > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works (Java 8) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-8552 [2] - Unable to use a date as > >> primary > >>>> key > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12227 [3] - Default auto-adjust baseline > >>>>> enabled > >>>>>>>> flag > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculated incorrectly in some cases > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-9489 [4] - CorruptedTreeException on > >>> index > >>>>>>> create. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2176 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8552 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12227 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9489 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 at 07:05, Saikat Maitra < > >>>>>>>>>>>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ivan, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you so much for your help, I really > >>>>> appreciate > >>>>>>> it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had a quick question and shared in the Jira > >>>> issue > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12424 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and share your feedback. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 3:45 AM Ivan > >> Pavlukhin > >>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please see my comment in ticket [1]. Also > >> you > >>>> can > >>>>>>> count > >>>>>>>>> on my > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assistance for the subject. Currently I > >> have > >>>> time > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> help > >>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>> it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12424 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 10 дек. 2019 г. в 06:15, Saikat Maitra > >> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ilya, Ivan > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for looping me in, I was > >> looking > >>>> into > >>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>> issue > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12424 > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>> looked into > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JdbcRequest and JdbcRequestHandler but I > >> do > >>>> not > >>>>>> see > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> timeout field. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was hoping the fix would be something > >>>> similar > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> adding > >>>>>>>>>>>> these 2 lines > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/odbc/odbc/OdbcRequestHandler.java#L348-L349 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please confirm if the Jdbc client > >>>> side > >>>>>>>> timeout > >>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>> even passed to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am fine to exclude > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7285 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make the release 2.8.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:52 AM Вячеслав > >>>>>> Коптилин < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Ilya, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the same issue as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12419 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This case should be covered by TCK > >> tests. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 9 дек. 2019 г. в 20:16, Ilya > >>>> Kasnacheev < > >>>>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found a regression to 2.7 > >> which > >>>>>>>>> unfortunately > >>>>>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>>>>> not caught > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12428 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to fix it before > >>>> releasing > >>>>>>> 2.8. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 9 дек. 2019 г. в 14:58, Ivan > >>>> Pavlukhin > >>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see the issue [1] is > >> unassigned. > >>> Do > >>>>> we > >>>>>>>> have a > >>>>>>>>>>>> person who will > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bravely? :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's wait Saikat as an original > >>> ticket > >>>>>>>>> contributor. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. The issue [1] doesn't seem > >> to > >>>> be a > >>>>>>> truly > >>>>>>>>>>>> release `blocker`. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me it sounds not good to > >>>>> intentionally > >>>>>>>>> include > >>>>>>>>>>>> such behavior > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> product release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 9 дек. 2019 г. в 13:26, Maxim > >>>>>> Muzafarov < > >>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see the issue [1] is > >> unassigned. > >>> Do > >>>>> we > >>>>>>>> have a > >>>>>>>>>>>> person who will > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bravely? :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If not I think it's better to > >>> revert > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>> issue > >>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>>>> the 2.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch and fix it in a calm > >> manner > >>> in > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> master > >>>>>>>>>>>> branch. I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suppose > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there will be enough of such > >>> changes > >>>> to > >>>>>>>>> perform a > >>>>>>>>>>>> next minor > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (e.g. 2.8.1) with such fixes. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. The issue [1] doesn't seem > >> to > >>>> be a > >>>>>>> truly > >>>>>>>>>>>> release `blocker`. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12424 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 at 11:39, Ivan > >>>>>>> Pavlukhin < > >>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat, igniters > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I raised a blocker [1] for 2.8 > >>>>> related > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>> recently > >>>>>>>>>>>> implemented > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> default > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> query timeout [2]. Currently we > >>>> have > >>>>> a > >>>>>>>> buggy > >>>>>>>>>>>> behavior for thin > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JDBC > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driver when a default timeout > >> is > >>>>>>>> configured. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually I see 2 options to go: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Fix the issue with thin JDBC > >>>> [1]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Exclude a default query > >>> timeout > >>>>>>> support > >>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>> from 2.8. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share your thoughts! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12424 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7285 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 6 дек. 2019 г. в 19:55, > >> Maxim > >>>>>>>> Muzafarov < > >>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slava, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for noticing. I think > >> we > >>>> can > >>>>>>>> include > >>>>>>>>>>> both > >>>>>>>>>>>> of them. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you need any help from my > >>>> side? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 at 14:02, > >>>>> Вячеслав > >>>>>>>>> Коптилин > >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found two issues that > >>> should > >>>> be > >>>>>>>>> included in > >>>>>>>>>>>> the upcoming > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AI > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12409 - > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Already > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be cherry-picked into > >> the > >>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>> branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12419 - > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one looks > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like a blocker for the > >>> release. > >>>>>>>>> Pull-request > >>>>>>>>>>>> is available. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 3 дек. 2019 г. в 15:30, > >>>>> Alexei > >>>>>>>>>>> Scherbakov < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No objections. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 3 дек. 2019 г. в > >> 15:02, > >>>>> Maxim > >>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet another issue [1] > >>> with > >>>>>>>> corrupted > >>>>>>>>>>>> B+Tree exception > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My suggestion is to > >>> revert > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11704 [3] issue > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> master > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch and rework the > >>>> patch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Configuration: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] persistence = false > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] persistence = true > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.CorruptedTreeException: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B+Tree is corrupted > >>>>>>> [pages(groupId, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pageId)=[IgniteBiTuple > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [val1=1544803905, > >>>>>>>>> val2=844420635196573]], > >>>>>>>>>>>> msg=Runtime > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failure > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor iteration] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree.corruptedTreeException(BPlusTree.java:5927) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree$AbstractForwardCursor.nextPage(BPlusTree.java:5438) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree$ForwardCursor.next(BPlusTree.java:5661) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.IgniteCacheOffheapManagerImpl$CacheDataStoreImpl$1.next(IgniteCacheOffheapManagerImpl.java:3020) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.topology.GridDhtLocalPartition$2.hasNextX(GridDhtLocalPartition.java:1226) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.lang.GridIteratorAdapter.hasNext(GridIteratorAdapter.java:45) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.topology.GridDhtLocalPartition.doClear(GridDhtLocalPartition.java:1295) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.topology.GridDhtLocalPartition.clearTombstones(GridDhtLocalPartition.java:1242) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.topology.PartitionsEvictManager$ClearTombstonesTask.run0(PartitionsEvictManager.java:673) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.topology.PartitionsEvictManager$AbstractEvictionTask.run(PartitionsEvictManager.java:587) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.wrapThreadLoader(IgniteUtils.java:7061) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.closure.GridClosureProcessor$1.body(GridClosureProcessor.java:827) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:120) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: > >>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: > >>>>>>>>> Key > >>>>>>>>>>>> is not ready: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CacheDataRowAdapter > >>>>> [key=null, > >>>>>>>>> val=null, > >>>>>>>>>>>> expireTime=-1, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ver=null, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cacheId=0, > >>>>>> link=0001003c000077d8] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.CacheDataRowAdapter.key(CacheDataRowAdapter.java:837) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.tree.CacheDataTree.compare(CacheDataTree.java:382) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.tree.CacheDataTree.compare(CacheDataTree.java:63) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree.compare(BPlusTree.java:5200) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree$AbstractForwardCursor.findLowerBound(BPlusTree.java:5317) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree$ForwardCursor.fillFromBuffer0(BPlusTree.java:5588) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree$AbstractForwardCursor.fillFromBuffer(BPlusTree.java:5376) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.persistence.tree.BPlusTree$AbstractForwardCursor.nextPage(BPlusTree.java:5428) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4807946&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_Cache9#testNameId1910487508546147692 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4796925&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_Cache9#testNameId7609674190425495190 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11704 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at > >>>> 13:39, > >>>>>>> Alexei > >>>>>>>>>>>> Scherbakov > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>> alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure this is > >>>>> purely a > >>>>>>>>>>>> "tombstone" problem, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a tree > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concurrency issue. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like the > >>>>> investigation > >>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>> required. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, > >> tombstone > >>>>> logic > >>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>> reverted but test > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logic > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is kept. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It seems Ivan Rakov > >>>> already > >>>>>>>>> suggested > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> revert a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from master > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in another thread. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пн, 2 дек. 2019 г. в > >>>> 17:17, > >>>>>>> Maxim > >>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've found a scary > >>>> error > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `CorruptedTreeException: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> B+Tree is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corrupted` on TC in > >>> the > >>>>>>> master > >>>>>>>>>>> branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>> It seems > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related to a [2] > >>>>> tombstone > >>>>>>>>>>>> implementation (probably > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone confirm > >>> that > >>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> problem > >>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actual? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it is true, do > >> we > >>>> have > >>>>>>> time > >>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>> resolving the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will it be better > >> to > >>>>> revert > >>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>> commit from the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=4796925&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_Cache9#testNameId7609674190425495190 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11704 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 > >>> at > >>>>>> 16:50, > >>>>>>>>> Maxim > >>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've had > >>>> conversations > >>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>> Nikolay > >>>>>>>>>>>> and Alexey > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> progress > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] on ML, Spark, > >>>>>>> Monitoring > >>>>>>>>>>>> features which we > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting for. It > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems the > >> progress > >>>>> dates > >>>>>>> is a > >>>>>>>>> bit > >>>>>>>>>>>> slower than we > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected earlier. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest the > >>> following > >>>>>>> dates: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 December - the > >>>>> release > >>>>>>>> branch > >>>>>>>>>>>> cutting. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30 December - > >> code > >>>>> freeze > >>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> release branch > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (only > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 27 January 2020 - > >>> the > >>>>>>> voting > >>>>>>>>> date > >>>>>>>>>>>> (2+ weeks of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stabilization > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> period) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any objections? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Awatingfeaturescompletion > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Nov > >> 2019 > >>> at > >>>>>>> 18:01, > >>>>>>>>> Maxim > >>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not yet. I will > >>>>>> announce > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> release branch > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cutting > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stage with a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate post, > >>>>>> probably, > >>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>> one > >>>>>>>>>>>> week before > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut. No one > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not miss it for > >>>> sure. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, all > >>>> issues > >>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>> safely > >>>>>>>>>>>> be pinned to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release, but > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge > >>>> issues\features > >>>>>>> (e.g. > >>>>>>>>>>>> `baseline topology`, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `persistence`) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are going to be > >>>>>> included > >>>>>>>>> into the > >>>>>>>>>>>> release, it's > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to have a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate thread > >>>>>>> discussion. > >>>>>>>>> Do > >>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>> have such > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mind? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to > >>>>> estimate > >>>>>>> new > >>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>> dates due > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all features > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we are waiting > >>> for > >>>>> [1] > >>>>>>> will > >>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>> completed by > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the due > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dates > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll back soon. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Awatingfeaturescompletion > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Nov > >>> 2019 > >>>> at > >>>>>>>> 17:46, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Goncharuk > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note - > >>> we > >>>>> did > >>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>> cut > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8 branch > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yet, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This > >>> information > >>>> is > >>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>> reflected on the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page and I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> realized > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it is > >> hard > >>>> to > >>>>>>> choose > >>>>>>>>> a fix > >>>>>>>>>>>> version for a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merged > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to master > >> when > >>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>> scope is > >>>>>>>>>>>> being > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finalized. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This moment is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> covered > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> neither in > >> the > >>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>> process > >>>>>>>>>>>> nor in the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development process > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (unless I am > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing > >>>> something). > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 6 нояб. > >>> 2019 > >>>>> г. в > >>>>>>>>> 13:55, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim Muzafarov > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it's > >>> true > >>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>>> currently, > >>>>>>>>>>>> all resolved > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 2.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will get > >> into > >>>> 2.8 > >>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Moreover, > >>> I've > >>>>>> marked > >>>>>>>> all > >>>>>>>>>>>> issues with empty > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion filed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since 2.7 > >>> major > >>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8 labels. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 > >> Nov > >>>>> 2019 > >>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>> 15:03, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pavlukhin < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you > >>>>> please > >>>>>>>>> elaborate > >>>>>>>>>>>> about a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Akash. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tickets > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do we > >>>> consider > >>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>> release? > >>>>>>>>>>>> All with 2.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jira > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a > >>>> different > >>>>>>>>> criteria? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 5 > >> нояб. > >>>>> 2019 > >>>>>>> г. в > >>>>>>>>>>> 15:01, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pavlukhin < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> True. > >> It > >>> is > >>>>>>>>> definitely to > >>>>>>>>>>>> early for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Calcite. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 5 > >>> нояб. > >>>>>> 2019 > >>>>>>>> г. в > >>>>>>>>>>>> 14:46, Alexey > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Zinoviev > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> zaleslaw....@gmail.com > >>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >> have > >>> no > >>>>>>> ideas, > >>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>> think > >>>>>>>>>>>> it's enough > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I > >>>>>> understand > >>>>>>>>> it's > >>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>> the proper > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Calcite > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so on, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't > >>> it > >>>>>> @Igor > >>>>>>>>>>>> Seliverstov? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 5 > >>>> нояб. > >>>>>>> 2019 > >>>>>>>>> г. в > >>>>>>>>>>>> 14:41, Maxim > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org > >>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do > >> we > >>>>> want > >>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> discuss > >>>>>>>>>>>> something? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> What > >>>> else > >>>>>>>>> features do > >>>>>>>>>>>> we want to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If > >>>> not, I > >>>>>>>>> propose to > >>>>>>>>>>>> exclude any > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> major features > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (except > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> discussed - > >>>>>>> ML, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Monitoring, Spark) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on bug > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> master > >>>>>> branch > >>>>>>>>>>>> stabilization. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On > >>> Wed, > >>>>> 30 > >>>>>>> Oct > >>>>>>>>> 2019 > >>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>> 17:57, Akash > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shinde > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> akashshi...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> Because I > >>>>>>>>> didn't > >>>>>>>>>>> see > >>>>>>>>>>>> it in this > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Releaseissuesgroupedbystatus > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Just > >>>>>> wanted > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>> make > >>>>>>>>>>>> sure its a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Akash > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> On > >>>> Wed, > >>>>>> Oct > >>>>>>>> 30, > >>>>>>>>>>> 2019 > >>>>>>>>>>>> at 8:20 PM > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pavlukhin < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Hi > >>>>>> Akash, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Why > >>>>> do > >>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>> think > >>>>>>>>>>>> it is not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see fix > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8 in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> [1]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10884 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> ср, > >>>>> 30 > >>>>>>> окт. > >>>>>>>>> 2019 > >>>>>>>>>>>> г. в 17:29, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Akash > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shinde < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> akashshi...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> Could > >>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>> please include > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-10884 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10884> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> This > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> issue > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>> blocker > >>>>>>>>>>>> for me. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Akash > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> On > >>>>>> Wed, > >>>>>>>>> Oct 30, > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2019 at 7:38 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muzafarov < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> mmu...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Folks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> It > >>>>>>>> seems > >>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>> week ago I've > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> replied > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> info > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> Artem. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Sorry > >>>>>>>>> about > >>>>>>>>>>>> that :-) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Here > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> what > >>>>>>>>>>>> I've > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collected. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Let's > >>>>>>>>>>> discuss! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> I've > >>>>>>>>> prepared > >>>>>>>>>>>> the Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8 release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the list > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> known > >>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>>>> which are > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8 release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> additional > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>> information. If > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feel free > >> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> set > >>>>>>>> `fix > >>>>>>>>>>>> version` with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `2.8`. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> Details: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> WAITING FOR > >>>>>>>>>>>> COMPLETION * > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Here > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> list of major > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which must > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> creating > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>>>>> Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>> ignite new > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monitoring > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>>> ML > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>>>> Spark > >>>>>>>>> 2.4 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> Details: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Awatingfeaturescompletion > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> * > >>>>>> TO > >>>>>>>>> DISCUSS > >>>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Previously > >>>>>>>>>>>> some of the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> features > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion > >>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>> finalized yet > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>>>>>> Automatic > >>>>>>>>>>>> modules > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> support for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> packages > >>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11461 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>>>>> Support > >>>>>>>>>>> Java > >>>>>>>>>>>> 11 for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11189 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>>>>>> Callbacks > >>>>>>>>>>>> from the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> striped > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pool > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> due to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> async/await may > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hang a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> cluster > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12033 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> * > >>>>>>> KNOWN > >>>>>>>>>>> ISSUES > >>>>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Bugs > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>> features sorted by > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priority. If > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> someone > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knows any > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> additional > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>> information > >>>>>>>>>>>> about any of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> `blocker` > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> step in. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>>>>> Unable > >>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>> use date as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8552 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> - > >>>>>>>> Cluster > >>>>>>>>>>>> hangs during > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> concurrent > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node client > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> restart > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9184 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>> Details: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolvedissues(notrelatedtodocumentation) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>>>> DOCUMENTATION * > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> The > >>>>>>>> list > >>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>> issues\tasks > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Apache > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
