Hello! I did not find the exact information but I can confirm that ignite-schedule 1.0.0 may see some downloads, but that's all. Since 1.0.0 we don't publish this artifact so its usage also remains a mystery.
Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пн, 23 дек. 2019 г. в 22:37, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > https://repository.apache.org > > At least Ignite PMC has access to data. > > - > Denis > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:35 AM Ilya Kasnacheev < > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > Can you guide me where these downloads are from? We don't seem to publish > > ignite-schedule to Maven Central since early 1.x. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > сб, 21 дек. 2019 г. в 03:20, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > Ilya, good points, then support the idea of the API removal in 3.0. > > > > > > Ivan, downloaded the screenshot to Google Drive: > > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N21N7yqCbeZtCNs1sHvJLiJfHF_Hp0wd/view?usp=sharing > > > > > > > > > - > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 7:09 AM Ilya Kasnacheev < > > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > This module has two obvious downsides: > > > > > > > > - It's LGPL. > > > > - It can only schedule locally. > > > > > > > > We could fix 1) by using other implementation, but given 2) this no > > > longer > > > > sounds feasible. If someone wants to use local scheduler, why not > just > > > use > > > > it directly? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > -- > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > > > > > > > пт, 20 дек. 2019 г. в 10:26, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > Denis, > > > > > > > > > > > The API is definitely used with even higher demand for the last > > > months > > > > > (overall the demand is comparable to Ignite Kafka and ML). See > > > > attachment. > > > > > I do not see the attachement. Where can I find it? > > > > > > > > > > чт, 19 дек. 2019 г. в 20:01, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > The API is definitely used with even higher demand for the last > > > months > > > > > (overall the demand is comparable to Ignite Kafka and ML). See > > > > attachment. > > > > > > > > > > > > If the module has some problems let's discuss them separately and > > see > > > > > how to approach first. Do we have a list of the issues tracked > > > anywhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:52 AM Valentin Kulichenko < > > > > > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Ivan, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> IGFS and Hadoop Accelerator had inherent architectural flaws - > the > > > > vast > > > > > >> majority of users who tried to use these features failed to > > achieve > > > > > >> expected results. And yes, at the same time the interest was > very > > > > high, > > > > > so > > > > > >> we really needed to take action :) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Scheduler module, on the other hand, works as expected and might > > be > > > > > used by > > > > > >> someone. There is no need to hurry. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> It probably makes sense to deprecate the functionality in 2.8 so > > > that > > > > > users > > > > > >> are aware of upcoming removal. But the removal itself should > > happen > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > >> major release. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -Val > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 12:09 AM Ivan Pavlukhin < > > > vololo...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Guys, > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Why some of us are so critical regarding the subject? If I > > recall > > > > > >> > correctly we decided to drop IGFS and Hadoop support before > 2.8 > > > > > >> > without much debate. And it was a feature users were > interested > > > in. > > > > I > > > > > >> > never saw an interest to IgniteSchedule. My statistics is > based > > on > > > > our > > > > > >> > User mailing list. > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > чт, 19 дек. 2019 г. в 11:00, Alexey Kuznetsov < > > > > akuznet...@apache.org > > > > > >: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > I will vote "+1" for 3.0 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:57 AM Anton Vinogradov < > > > a...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > My Vote was for 3.0 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:44 AM Valentin Kulichenko < > > > > > >> > > > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > Is this suggested for 3.0 or 2.8? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > I tend to agree with Alexey - API compatibility should > be > > > > > preserved > > > > > >> > > > within > > > > > >> > > > > a major version. I would oppose doing such a change in > > 2.x. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > If this is planned for 3.0, then it's a definite +1 from > > me. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > -Val > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:34 PM Alexey Kuznetsov < > > > > > >> > akuznet...@apache.org > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > What if some users already using this module? > > > > > >> > > > > > What they should do? Rewrite code? > > > > > >> > > > > > I do not think it is a good idea. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > My "-1" here. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:53 AM Anton Vinogradov < > > > > > a...@apache.org> > > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ignite-schedule does not look to be properly located > > or > > > > > useful. > > > > > >> > > > > > > My +1 here. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:35 AM Ivan Pavlukhin < > > > > > >> > vololo...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Ilya, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I think it is a good initiative! Do we really need > > to > > > > keep > > > > > >> > > > > > > > run/callLocall methods at all? > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > ср, 18 дек. 2019 г. в 17:59, Ilya Kasnacheev < > > > > > il...@apache.org > > > > > >> > >: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Since 2.8 is branched, I want to initiate the > > > > discussion > > > > > >> > about > > > > > >> > > > > > removal > > > > > >> > > > > > > of > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ignite-schedule module. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > My plan as follows: > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Remove ignite-schedule module entirely. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Move runLocal and callLocal methods from > > > > > IgniteScheduler to > > > > > >> > > > > > > > IgniteCompute. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Delete IgniteScheduler interface with its > > remaining > > > > > >> > > > scheduleLocal() > > > > > >> > > > > > > > methods. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Rationale: Ignite is not a tool for local > > > scheduling, > > > > > >> > > > > IgniteScheduler > > > > > >> > > > > > > > does > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > not provide any means of remote scheduling, and > I > > > > don't > > > > > think > > > > > >> > > > > anybody > > > > > >> > > > > > > is > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > using that (especially since ignite-schedule is > > > > > unpublished > > > > > >> > LGPL > > > > > >> > > > > > > module). > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I would like to hear opinions as well as > positive > > > and > > > > > >> > negative > > > > > >> > > > > votes > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > towards this. If I won't see any activity, I > will > > go > > > > > forward > > > > > >> > with > > > > > >> > > > > > JIRA > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > issue. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Previous discussion: > > > > > >> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5565 > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > We tried to move it to Quartz but it changed > > > semantics > > > > > in > > > > > >> > some > > > > > >> > > > > ways. > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > > Alexey Kuznetsov > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > -- > > > > > >> > > Alexey Kuznetsov > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > >> > Best regards, > > > > > >> > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
