That's right, only C++ and .NET clients have partition awareness

Best Regards,
Igor


On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 5:02 PM Artem Budnikov <abudni...@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Looks like the following line from the Ignite 2.8 release notes is a bit
> of an overstatement and should be removed:
>
> > Added support best effort affinity for thin clients (partition awareness)
>
> Java thin client does not support partition awareness. Nodejs and python
> thin clients from the distribution package do not have signs of this
> feature as well.
>
> Igor,
>
> Could you please confirm or deny this?
>
> -Artem
>
> Artem Budnikov
> Technical Writergridgain.com
>
> On 03.03.2020 01:47, Denis Magda wrote:
>
> Hi Alexey,
>
> Thanks for updating the documentation. The update process is cumbersome as
> of now. What will happen is that we will be replacing the content of the
> current pages (pre 2.8 pages) with the content from the 2.8 versions. Once
> the text is copied manually, a 2.8 version of the page will be deleted. I
> would advise Artem to do that this time and update the wiki page with more
> details:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Document
>
> Also, why should we release this page?
> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/genetic-algorithms
>
> -
> Denis
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2020 at 7:59 AM Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Igniters, I've finished the ML documentation.
>>
>> I have the issue that, for example I've created a new version of page with
>> postfix -2.8 and the page name contains this postfix.
>> How are we going to replace the URL? Or we will replace the content from
>> initial page?
>>
>> For example, I've created the new version of page
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/decision-trees
>> and
>> moved it under new page
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/decision-trees-28
>> How it will be processed to obtain the  decision-trees url for the new
>> page?
>>
>>
>> In all case the full list of removed/replaced pages for ML is next:
>>
>> In the release 2.8, please remove the pages
>>
>>    1.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/genetic-algorithms
>>
>>    2.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/svm-multi-class-classification
>>
>>    3. DeepLearning block with 3 pages
>>    4.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/model-cross-validation
>>
>>
>> Next pages were replaced with postfix 2.8 and grouped under new pages
>>
>>    1.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/machine-learning
>>
>>    2.
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/preprocessing
>>
>>    3.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/ols-multiple-linear-regression
>>
>>    4.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/k-means-clustering
>>
>>    5.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/multilayer-perceptron
>>
>>    6.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/knn-classification
>>
>>    7.
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/knn-regression
>>
>>    8.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/svm-binary-classification
>>
>>    9.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/logistic-regression
>>
>>    10.
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/random-forest
>>
>>    11.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/gradient-boosting
>>
>>    12.
>>    https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/model-updating
>>    13.
>>
>> https://dash.readme.io/project/apacheignite/v2.7.6/docs/ann-approximate-nearest-neighbor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ср, 26 февр. 2020 г. в 03:32, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>>
>> > Hi Prasad,
>> >
>> > This is odd behavior and before changing the docs I would try to get to
>> the
>> > bottom. Let me join the user list conversation.
>> >
>> > -
>> > Denis
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:46 AM Prasad Bhalerao <
>> > prasadbhalerao1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Can we have this behavior documented? This will help user to design
>> their
>> > > caches appropriately.
>> > >
>> > > *For Replicated Cache:*
>> > >
>> > > Reference mail thread:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Read-through-not-working-as-expected-in-case-of-Replicated-cache-td29990.html
>> > >
>> > >  read through for replicated cache would work where there is either:
>> > > - writeThrough enabled and all changes do through it.
>> > > - database contents do not change for already read keys.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Prasad
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 7:31 PM Alexey Zinoviev <
>> zaleslaw....@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Please, could you post in this thread a few examples of the
>> > documentation
>> > > > tickets in JIRA for the current release, to create them correctly?
>> > > >
>> > > > пн, 24 февр. 2020 г. в 14:53, Alexey Zinoviev <
>> zaleslaw....@gmail.com
>> > >:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Ok, will make ticket, no problemo
>> > > > >
>> > > > > вс, 23 февр. 2020 г., 23:28 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Alex, thanks for helping with the documentation. Frankly, the
>> > tickets
>> > > > >> will be useful to get a complete list of all the updates pages
>> with
>> > > the
>> > > > >> goal of extracting info for blog post(s) - we'll be preparing at
>> > least
>> > > > one
>> > > > >> blog for Ignite 2.8 and can create an ML specific blog as well.
>> > Also,
>> > > > the
>> > > > >> tickets might simplify the review process between you and Artem.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> -
>> > > > >> Denis
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:18 AM Alexey Zinoviev <
>> > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> I've created a draft pages on apache.readme.io and will
>> continue
>> > my
>> > > > >>> work there during next 2 weeks.
>> > > > >>> Should I create any tickets for that? Or could miss that step?
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Will notify in this thread than the work will be done!
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> чт, 20 февр. 2020 г. в 12:16, Alexey Zinoviev <
>> > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com
>> > > > >:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Yes, there are a lot of changes in ML from 2.7, I'm going to
>> > prepare
>> > > > >>>> new documentation  and create documentation related tickets for
>> > the
>> > > ML
>> > > > >>>> component.
>> > > > >>>> After some consultation and review from Artem side I'll add new
>> > > > >>>> documentation on readme.io.
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> чт, 20 февр. 2020 г. в 02:34, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Artem,
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> Thanks for stepping in and preparing the list of top priority
>> > > > >>>>> documentation tasks! How about labeling those tickets somehow
>> and
>> > > > creating
>> > > > >>>>> a filter similar to this one [1] but for "Required &
>> Unresolved
>> > > > >>>>> Documentation Tasks"? I would simply add this as a new
>> section to
>> > > the
>> > > > >>>>> Ignite 2.8 release wiki page for ease of tracking and start
>> > working
>> > > > with
>> > > > >>>>> the guys contributed improvements directly. Will see the
>> names of
>> > > the
>> > > > >>>>> authors who need to be involved ;)
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> *Alexey Zinoviev*, there are many ML related changes coming in
>> > the
>> > > > >>>>> release. Could you check existing ML docs and suggest any
>> > changes?
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> [1]
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolveddocumentationtasks
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> -
>> > > > >>>>> Denis
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:14 AM Artem Budnikov <
>> > > > >>>>> a.budnikov.ign...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Maxim,
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> One note from my side, I think we can move disk page
>> compression
>> > > [1]
>> > > > >>>>>> > to the 2-nd priority, but definitely must document WAL page
>> > > > >>>>>> > compression first [2]
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> OK, good to know.
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 6:48 PM Maxim Muzafarov <
>> > > mmu...@apache.org>
>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> > Artem,
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>> > Thank you for starting this thread.
>> > > > >>>>>> > One note from my side, I think we can move disk page
>> > compression
>> > > > [1]
>> > > > >>>>>> > to the 2-nd priority, but definitely must document WAL page
>> > > > >>>>>> > compression first [2]
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>> > The list of important tasks [3].
>> > > > >>>>>> > The list of documentation tasks [4].
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10330
>> > > > >>>>>> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11336
>> > > > >>>>>> > [3]
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Themostimportantreleasetasks
>> > > > >>>>>> > [4]
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolveddocumentationtasks
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 18:15, Artem Budnikov
>> > > > >>>>>> > <a.budnikov.ign...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> > > As the release of Ignite 2.8 is getting closer, let's
>> > discuss
>> > > > >>>>>> which
>> > > > >>>>>> > features should be documented. I created a list of features
>> > > based
>> > > > >>>>>> on the
>> > > > >>>>>> > release notes and the documentation tickets in jira (see
>> > below).
>> > > > >>>>>> Much more
>> > > > >>>>>> > has been added, but these seemed to have first priority.
>> It's
>> > > not
>> > > > >>>>>> to say
>> > > > >>>>>> > that other features are not important, but given the
>> limited
>> > > > >>>>>> resources a
>> > > > >>>>>> > list of high-priority task would help to schedule the time
>> of
>> > > > those
>> > > > >>>>>> who
>> > > > >>>>>> > will help with the docs.
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Here is the list of features:
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Disk page compression
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Metrics and System Views documentation
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Default Ignite work dir location
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Baseline auto-adjust feature
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Cluster (de)activation events documentation
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Remove SqlQuery documentation
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Partition awareness for thin clients
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Transactions support in thin clients
>> > > > >>>>>> > > KILL QUERY command
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Move rebalance configuration properties to the
>> > > > >>>>>> IgniteConfiguration level
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Renamed IGNITE schema to SYS
>> > > > >>>>>> > > JDBC: Support for query cancellation
>> > > > >>>>>> > > JDBC: Support for query timeout
>> > > > >>>>>> > > suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> > > Now, two really big questions here:
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> > > If you want to add anything else to the documentation,
>> > please
>> > > > let
>> > > > >>>>>> us
>> > > > >>>>>> > know in this thread.
>> > > > >>>>>> > > If you are the author of any of the features listed
>> above,
>> > > > please
>> > > > >>>>>> share
>> > > > >>>>>> > the details on the feature. You can do it by creating a
>> > > > >>>>>> documentation
>> > > > >>>>>> > ticket. If you want to contribute a page or section to the
>> > > > existing
>> > > > >>>>>> docs,
>> > > > >>>>>> > you can write directly on apacheignite.readme.io (send me
>> a
>> > > note
>> > > > >>>>>> if you
>> > > > >>>>>> > don't have an account there). Any help is greatly
>> appreciated.
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> > > -Artem
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> > >
>> > > > >>>>>> >
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to