Folks, +1 Travis-ci
I see no disadvantages of having multiple CI tools due to: - it's free for open-source and can be disabled at any time without any consequences; - it will free TeamCity from running builds on each PR and TC can focus on tests execution; - we can perform more sophisticated checks with this tool like a PR title format (e.g. IGNITE-XXXXX: Sample) It seems the TC.Bot can also be integrated with GitHub checks via REST API [1]. I've checked locally the Ignite build procedure with travis-ci and GitHub checks [2] and looks like everything is working fine. Who can configure the similar things on Apache Ignite GitHub mirror? Does anyone have such access rights? [1] https://developer.github.com/v3/checks/runs/ [2] https://github.com/Mmuzaf/ignite/pull/1/checks?check_run_id=584537955 On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 10:37, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On another hand, it seems weird to have both TeamCity and Travis > > And don’t forget MTCGA bot! > > > > 14 апр. 2020 г., в 10:23, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> написал(а): > > > > We should have PR checks for sure. > > > > On one hand, I agree with Denis: > > - Travis is very easy to set up in GitHub > > - Config file (travis.yml) is stored in git, which is great > > > > On another hand, it seems weird to have both TeamCity and Travis. > > Thoughts? > > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:16 AM Denis Garus <garus....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello! > >> > >> I have seen projects with Travis-ci they look cool. > >> I think Travis-ci is a good solution. > >> > >> вт, 14 апр. 2020 г. в 10:00, Andrey Mashenkov <andrey.mashen...@gmail.com > >>> : > >> > >>> Maxim, > >>> > >>> Good idea. I'd add a license check as well. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:14 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Igniters, > >>>> > >>>> It's really `must-have` feature for me to enable Apache Ignite > >>>> pull-request status checks on GitHub. Currently we don't have any of > >>>> them. The most obvious check for each pull-request is: > >>>> - build the source code and check code-style violations; > >>>> > >>>> This will give us some advantages. For instance: > >>>> 1. Each PR even a very simple (not require tests execution) will be > >>>> checked by checkstyle and for compile errors. > >>>> 2. Developers can be get notified earlier if checkstyle has been > >>>> violated in their PRs. > >>>> > >>>> To achieve this we can do the following: > >>>> 1. Configure our TeamCity integration with the Ignite GitHub > >>>> repository and PR build. It seems it is possible [2]. > >>>> 2. Use Travis-ci which is free for open-source projects and also has > >>>> an integration with GitHub checks [1]. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> What do you think? > >>>> What options will be the best for us? > >>>> > >>>> [1] > >>>> > >>> > >> https://blog.travis-ci.com/2018-05-07-announcing-support-for-github-checks-api-on-travis-ci-com > >>>> [2] > >>>> > >>> > >> https://himynameistim.com/2018/01/16/adding-build-statuses-to-pull-requests-with-teamcity-and-github/ > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> Andrey V. Mashenkov > >>> > >> >