Raymond, Thanks for the details. So it sounds like you have a custom affinity mapper, not affinity function. This makes things simpler, but I'm still failing to understand why standard mechanisms for collocation [1] didn't work for you. Could you please clarify?
[1] https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/data-modeling/affinity-collocation -Val On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 12:25 AM Raymond Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > In terms of Key -> Partition -> Node mapping, we provide customer affinity > mappers for the Key -> Partition stage an allow Ignite to map partitions to > nodes. > > Our keys are structs with multiple fields forming a composite primary key, > parts of which are spatially identifying and parts contain other > characteristics. We want to ensure all related spatial elements resolve to > the same partition and so will be placed on the same node for query > colocation purposes. > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 9:20 PM Valentin Kulichenko < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Moti, Raymond, > > > > Could you please describe your use cases in more detail? What are the > types > > used as cache keys? What is the custom logic that you use for affinity > > mapping? What was the exact reason to customize versus using built-in > > collocation mechanisms? > > > > Ultimately, I'm sure that custom affinity functions will go away cause > they > > introduce multiple potential issues. However, I would definitely like to > > make sure that your use cases are still supported in Ignite 3.0 via some > > other means. > > > > -Val > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 12:21 PM Alexei Scherbakov < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the clarification. > > > > > > There was no intention to remove the customizable key to partition > > mapping. > > > > > > Difficulties arise when mapping partitions to nodes, so it's desirable > to > > > have internally tested implementation with a way to customize it's > > behavior > > > without additional coding on the user side. > > > > > > пн, 2 нояб. 2020 г. в 23:01, Raymond Wilson < > [email protected] > > >: > > > > > > > Just to be clear, the affinity functions we are using convert keys to > > > > partitions, we do not map partitions to nodes and leave that to > Ignite. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 8:48 AM Alexei Scherbakov < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > > > Custom affinity functions can cause weird bugs and data loss if > > > > implemented > > > > > wrongly. > > > > > There is an intention to keep a backup filter based on user > > attributes > > > > > (with additional validation logic to ensure correctness) for > > > controllable > > > > > data placement. > > > > > > > > > > Can you describe more precisely why you had to implement custom > > > affinity > > > > > functions and not resort to default rendezvous affinity + backup > > > filter ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 2 нояб. 2020 г. в 21:45, Raymond Wilson < > > > [email protected] > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > We also use custom affinity functions (vis the C# client). > > > > > > > > > > > > The wish list mentions use of a particular annotation > > > > > > (@CentralizedAffinityFunction): > > > > > > Is the wish to remove just this annotation, or the ability to > > define > > > > > custom > > > > > > affinity functions at all? > > > > > > > > > > > > In our case we use affinity functions to ensure particular > > > distribution > > > > > of > > > > > > spatial data across a processing cluster to ensure even load > > > > management. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:31 AM Moti Nisenson < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I saw at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist > > > > > > > that custom affinity functions are on the potential wishlist > for > > > > > removal. > > > > > > > The way we're using it's very critical that we be able to > control > > > the > > > > > > > placement of data quite precisely - as part of that we specify > > > > > explicitly > > > > > > > the partition we want in the key, and then our affinity > function > > > uses > > > > > > that > > > > > > > (else delegating to default rendezvous). We don't need all the > > > > > > > abilities there, although I think that often others do. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This seems to me to be a case that the benefit of removing this > > is > > > > > > minimal > > > > > > > and could cause quite a lot of disruption to users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > <http://www.trimble.com/> > > > > > > Raymond Wilson > > > > > > Solution Architect, Civil Construction Software Systems (CCSS) > > > > > > 11 Birmingham Drive | Christchurch, New Zealand > > > > > > +64-21-2013317 Mobile > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://worksos.trimble.com/?utm_source=Trimble&utm_medium=emailsign&utm_campaign=Launch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Alexei Scherbakov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > <http://www.trimble.com/> > > > > Raymond Wilson > > > > Solution Architect, Civil Construction Software Systems (CCSS) > > > > 11 Birmingham Drive | Christchurch, New Zealand > > > > +64-21-2013317 Mobile > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > https://worksos.trimble.com/?utm_source=Trimble&utm_medium=emailsign&utm_campaign=Launch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Alexei Scherbakov > > > > > > > > -- > <http://www.trimble.com/> > Raymond Wilson > Solution Architect, Civil Construction Software Systems (CCSS) > 11 Birmingham Drive | Christchurch, New Zealand > +64-21-2013317 Mobile > [email protected] > > < > https://worksos.trimble.com/?utm_source=Trimble&utm_medium=emailsign&utm_campaign=Launch > > >
