Hi Valentin,

Yes, of course.
I closed tickets for fixed issues and created a few more new ones.

On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 8:57 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Fedor,
>
> Thanks again - you're really helping to improve the quality of the release.
>
> I've fixed everything except for the progress bar issue - should not be a
> blocker though, I will move it outside of the alpha if I do not succeed by
> the end of tomorrow.
>
> Can you please verify that other issues are fixed (especially
> IGNITE-13936)? Here is the new staging:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheignite-1500/
>
> -Val
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 5:31 AM Fedor Malchikov <fmalchi...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Valentin,
> > I looked at the resources available on staging and found a number of
> > additional issues:
> > One blocker:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13936
> > and three minor:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13938
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13937
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13939
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:24 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I've also noticed that there is functionality allowing to use custom
> > Maven
> > > repositories. However, it is available only for the 'module add'
> command,
> > > but not for the 'init' command. Created a ticket for this as well:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13923
> > >
> > > -Val
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:21 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Fedor,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for doing this!
> > > >
> > > > Regarding IGNITE-13921: in the first version, the tool created the
> > > folders
> > > > in the current directory, which created unpredictable behavior, so we
> > > > switched to home as default. However, using the folder where the tool
> > is
> > > > located instead of the home folder seems fair - I've included the
> > ticket
> > > > into the alpha1. Also, note that in the next versions, there will be
> an
> > > > option to customize the paths, so the user will not have to rely on
> > > default
> > > > values.
> > > >
> > > > If you don't mind, I suggest to postpone other issues for further
> > > > development - they do not look so critical.
> > > >
> > > > -Val
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 9:45 AM Fedor Malchikov <
> > fmalchi...@gridgain.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > >> I smoke tested the alpha version of the CLI tool on ubuntu and
> > windows.
> > > So
> > > >> I found the following issues:
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13914
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13924
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13921
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13922
> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13920
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 2:18 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > > >> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Folks,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I've created a version in Jira and a Wiki page for the alpha
> > release:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0.0-alpha1
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Based on the scope described earlier, all code changes are
> > completed -
> > > >> only
> > > >> > documentation is left. Code freeze starts now - only bug fixes are
> > > >> > permitted.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm planning to start the vote next week, presumably on Tuesday.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > -Val
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:56 AM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > > >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Ivan,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Yes, you are correct - no tables, caches, compute or any other
> > major
> > > >> > > features will be available.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Alpha releases are generally produced in the middle of the
> > > development
> > > >> > > process for internal testing. In my view, that's exactly what
> the
> > > >> > upcoming
> > > >> > > release is, but let me know if you have a better naming in mind.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > -Val
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 1:56 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
> > vololo...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >> Hi,
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Is it right that suggested Alpha will not be able to perform
> any
> > > >> > >> operations with data (tables, caches)? In that case Alpha
> naming
> > > >> > >> confuses me. Actually do not know how such kind of demo
> releases
> > > >> > >> should be attributed.
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> 2020-12-21 20:42 GMT+03:00, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
> > > >> > >> > Certainly, the end of Jan is more realistic and reasonable.
> > Let's
> > > >> talk
> > > >> > >> this
> > > >> > >> > out offline and then put a session on the virtual meetup's
> > > >> schedule.
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > -
> > > >> > >> > Denis
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 4:35 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > > >> > >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >> >> Hi Denis,
> > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > >> >> Sure, that's a great idea! I'm thinking, however, that it
> > makes
> > > >> sense
> > > >> > >> to
> > > >> > >> >> take a pause after the release and let people try it out on
> > > their
> > > >> own
> > > >> > >> so
> > > >> > >> >> that the experience is as close to real-life as possible.
> How
> > > >> about
> > > >> > >> >> closer
> > > >> > >> >> to the end of January?
> > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > >> >> -Val
> > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:53 PM Denis Magda <
> > dma...@apache.org>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > >> >> > Hi Val,
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> > That's the pace, I'll be happy to play with the alpha and
> > > share
> > > >> > >> >> > feedback.
> > > >> > >> >> > Also, what if we arrange a community gathering after the
> > > >> holidays
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > >> >> > demonstrate what alpha does and get more details from the
> > > >> involved
> > > >> > >> >> > contributors on what's coming next?
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> > As for the release process, yes, that needs to be a formal
> > > vote
> > > >> as
> > > >> > >> long
> > > >> > >> >> as
> > > >> > >> >> > you're publishing artifacts to Maven and updating the
> > website
> > > >> with
> > > >> > >> >> > references to the binaries and documentation pages.
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> > -
> > > >> > >> >> > Denis
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:13 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > > >> > >> >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >> > > Igniters,
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > The repository for Ignite 3.x [1] was created less than
> a
> > > >> month
> > > >> > >> ago,
> > > >> > >> >> and
> > > >> > >> >> > we
> > > >> > >> >> > > already have several merged pull requests. Many thanks
> to
> > > >> > everyone
> > > >> > >> >> > involved
> > > >> > >> >> > > for the contributions!
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > Currently, we have the following functionality available
> > in
> > > >> the
> > > >> > >> main
> > > >> > >> >> > > branch:
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > >    - New configuration framework which is compatible
> with
> > > the
> > > >> > HOCON
> > > >> > >> >> > format.
> > > >> > >> >> > >    - The “ignite-runner” module, which currently
> > > incorporates
> > > >> the
> > > >> > >> >> > >    aforementioned configuration framework and REST
> > endpoints
> > > >> to
> > > >> > >> >> interact
> > > >> > >> >> > > with
> > > >> > >> >> > >    the framework.
> > > >> > >> >> > >    - The first version of the unified CLI tool.
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > This set of features does not include any actual Ignite
> > > APIs.
> > > >> > >> >> > > However,
> > > >> > >> >> it
> > > >> > >> >> > > clearly demonstrates the basic mechanics of how the
> > product
> > > >> will
> > > >> > be
> > > >> > >> >> > > installed and upgraded, how the user will interact with
> > it,
> > > >> etc.
> > > >> > I
> > > >> > >> >> would
> > > >> > >> >> > > like to use this to gather feedback from the community
> in
> > > the
> > > >> > early
> > > >> > >> >> > stages.
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > To make sure the experience is as close to real life as
> > > >> > possible, I
> > > >> > >> >> want
> > > >> > >> >> > to
> > > >> > >> >> > > deliver what we have as an alpha release, meaning that
> all
> > > the
> > > >> > >> >> > > required
> > > >> > >> >> > > binaries will be deployed on the website and in Maven.
> > There
> > > >> will
> > > >> > >> >> > > also
> > > >> > >> >> be
> > > >> > >> >> > > some basic documentation describing how to install and
> use
> > > the
> > > >> > >> >> > > product.
> > > >> > >> >> > > This way, anyone will be able to download the product
> and
> > > try
> > > >> it
> > > >> > >> out.
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > My main question here -- do we need a formal vote for
> > such a
> > > >> > build?
> > > >> > >> >> > > Or
> > > >> > >> >> it
> > > >> > >> >> > > can be treated as a release candidate?
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > Any other thoughts?
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> > > -Val
> > > >> > >> >> > >
> > > >> > >> >> >
> > > >> > >> >>
> > > >> > >> >
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> --
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >> Best regards,
> > > >> > >> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > >> > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to