Guys, I've created the following ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15046
Please feel free to comment or edit it. If there are no objections, I'll create a PR soon. Regards, Nikita чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:54, Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2...@gmail.com>: > Ivan, thank you for the links! > > Well, I can still find the docs on Python Thin Client under the "Thin > Сlients"->"Python Thin Client" in 2.10: > https://ignite.apache.org/docs/2.10.0/thin-clients/python-thin-client > > So, I can replace the contents of "Thin Сlients"->"Python Thin Client" > page with a link to the > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ and > a short note as follows: > "To see the documentation on Python Thin Client, please click here[link to > the readthedocs.io > <https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/>]. > + > And I can also change the link here > <https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/thin-clients/getting-started-with-thin-clients> > (after > "Ignite provides the following thin clients:", so that it would lead to the > readthedocs.io > <https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/> > too). > > Alex, my bad, I misread the first question and thought that all the docs > on thin clients have been migrated to the readthedocs.io > <https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/>. > The articles are absolutely OK :) > > Regards, > Nikita > > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:44, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>: > >> Nikita, >> >> What's wrong with platform-specific thin-client articles? These articles >> describe how to configure and use specific thin client implementation, why >> should we remove them? >> >> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 16:06, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Binary prorocol description should stand and improved (there are some >>> mistakes in this article) >>> >>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 16:05 Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> > https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ >>> > >>> > AFAIK, thin clients have been already removed since 2.10 >>> > >>> > чт, 1 июл. 2021 г., 15:57 Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2...@gmail.com>: >>> > >>> >> Hi guys! >>> >> >>> >> Sorry, totally missed this email. >>> >> >>> >> I can do this right away. >>> >> >>> >> Just a couple of questions first: >>> >> >>> >> [1] On the website, under the Thin Clients tab, we have the following >>> >> articles: >>> >> >>> >> Thin Clients >>> >> Thin Clients Overview >>> >> Java Thin Client >>> >> .NET Thin Client >>> >> C++ Thin Client >>> >> Python Thin Client >>> >> PHP Thin Client >>> >> Node.js Thin Client >>> >> Binary Client Protocol >>> >> >>> >> I do believe that the introduction ( "Thin Clients" - the first one) >>> >> should >>> >> remain, while we can remove the rest (by the way, what about Binary >>> Client >>> >> Protocol? Should it remain too?). >>> >> What do you think about this? >>> >> >>> >> [2] Could you please indicate the place in the docs where the link to >>> the >>> >> actual readthedocs.io documentation is? I didn't manage to find it. >>> >> If we don't have it, I would place it at the beginning of the Thin >>> >> clients' >>> >> introduction article. >>> >> >>> >> Regards, >>> >> Nikita >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 09:36, Alexey Gidaspov <olive.c...@gmail.com>: >>> >> >>> >> > Hi, Nikita! >>> >> > >>> >> > Your help with documentation is really needed. Can you describe how >>> we >>> >> can >>> >> > start with it? >>> >> > >>> >> > On 2021/06/09 10:06:09, Nikita Safonov <vlasovpavel2...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > > Hello Igniters! >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I guess that AI 2.11 will include documentation work. >>> >> > > I'll be glad to help with this. >>> >> > > And I'll be happy to know the scope of features that we need to >>> >> document. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Regards, >>> >> > > Nikita >>> >> > > >>> >> > > пт, 4 июн. 2021 г. в 03:50, 18624049226 <18624049...@163.com>: >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > hello, >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > can someone can help to merge the following patch into master? >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12852 >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > This patch has been completed for a long time, and I think it >>> is a >>> >> > > > valuable one. >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > 在 2021/6/3 下午11:12, Dmitry Pavlov 写道: >>> >> > > > > Sure, thanks for your reply >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > Folks, could you please advice how to setup JIRA account >>> >> integration >>> >> > for >>> >> > > > non-committers? >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > For the page >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.11 >>> >> > > > > I can see all issues, but Alexey's login seems to be not >>> >> sufficient. >>> >> > Can >>> >> > > > wiki admins set up smth? Or Alexey should do some setup on his >>> own? >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > On 2021/06/03 14:55:25, Maksim Timonin < >>> timonin.ma...@gmail.com> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > > >> I mean I'm OK to release it with 2.12. So, I am glad to hear >>> >> there >>> >> > are >>> >> > > > >> chances for 2.11, but I guess we can postpone it. >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:39 PM Dmitry Pavlov < >>> dpav...@apache.org >>> >> > >>> >> > > > wrote: >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >>> ok, Maksim, keep us posted. >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> We're in the middle of paperwork rigth now, so there is a >>> >> chance )) >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> On 2021/06/03 14:30:55, Maksim Timonin < >>> timonin.ma...@gmail.com >>> >> > >>> >> > > > wrote: >>> >> > > > >>>>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on >>> readiness. I >>> >> > guess >>> >> > > > if >>> >> > > > >>> it >>> >> > > > >>>> is not in the master, we can skip and release it next time. >>> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > >>>> Hi, Dmitry! Yes, currently it is on review. I'm OK to >>> release >>> >> it >>> >> > > > within >>> >> > > > >>> the >>> >> > > > >>>> next release. >>> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > >>>> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 5:26 PM Dmitry Pavlov < >>> >> dpav...@apache.org> >>> >> > > > wrote: >>> >> > > > >>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> Hi Alexey, >>> >> > > > >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> Releasing master as-is makes sence for me. >>> >> > > > >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> Regarding non-SQL index API it really depends on >>> readiness. I >>> >> > guess >>> >> > > > if >>> >> > > > >>> it >>> >> > > > >>>>> is not in the master, we can skip and release it next >>> time. >>> >> > > > >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> We've a bit overdue initial scope freeze date. It's not a >>> big >>> >> > deal, >>> >> > > > but >>> >> > > > >>>>> still makes sense to start discussion, create and share >>> wiki >>> >> > page and >>> >> > > > >>>>> create branch. >>> >> > > > >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> Since committer privileges required to create branch, >>> could >>> >> you >>> >> > > > please >>> >> > > > >>>>> notify me in advance. >>> >> > > > >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> Sincerely, >>> >> > > > >>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov >>> >> > > > >>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>> On 2021/06/03 14:08:34, �������������� ���������������� < >>> >> > > > >>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > > > >>>>>> :scope: >>> >> > > > >>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>>> Here is a list [1] of 195 tickets, i picked for Apache >>> Ignite >>> >> > 2.11 >>> >> > > > >>>>> release >>> >> > > > >>>>>> Let's start discussion >>> >> > > > >>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>>> [1] >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14781?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20%20AND%20status%20%20%3D%20Resolved%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.11%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC >>> >> > > > >>>>>> On 2021/05/13 14:27:33, Dmitry Pavlov < >>> dpav...@apache.org> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Hi Alexey, >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> :pmc to sign distribution: >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Formally, only PMC member can be a release manager, so >>> part >>> >> of >>> >> > > > >>>>> activities should be picked up by committer and PMC >>> member. If >>> >> > noone >>> >> > > > >>> else >>> >> > > > >>>>> want to help you here, I would. >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> :timeline: >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> And, could you estimate all phases of the release. >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> :scope: >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> I guess we can just pick up master current state and >>> release >>> >> > it. >>> >> > > > >>> But >>> >> > > > >>>>> if someone has some ideas if we should wait for particular >>> >> > feature to >>> >> > > > >>> be >>> >> > > > >>>>> completed before branch divergence/release candidate >>> build, >>> >> > please >>> >> > > > let >>> >> > > > >>> know. >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Sincerely, >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>>>> On 2021/05/13 09:45:02, Алексей Гидаспов < >>> >> olive.c...@gmail.com >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > >>>>> wrote: >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Dear Ignite Community! >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> I suggest starting Apache Ignite 2.11 release >>> activities. >>> >> Also >>> >> > > > >>>>> suggest >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> myself to be a release manager for this release. I plan >>> >> > release >>> >> > > > >>> at >>> >> > > > >>>>> the end >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> of june 2021. >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> ___ >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> Alexey Gidaspov >>> >> > > > >>>>>>>> >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >>
