Igniters,

I suggest adding [1] to the scope of release, because it contains
changes to code introduced by [2], which is already included in release.

[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14815
[2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14658

Best Regards,
Igor


On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:30 PM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> The issues mentioned above were successfully resolved and
> cherry-picked to the ignite-2.11 branch. Sorry for the delay. I think
> we can proceed with the release.
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 15:44, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > Yes, both the fixes [1] [2] will not require performance tests rerun.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15146
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 15:30, Dmitry Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > I personally trust opinion of Nikolay and Maxim, we can consider both
> as blockers.
> > >
> > > Just an idea to consider:
> > > For fixed ticket/PR (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170)  most likely we don't
> need to re-run performance tests.
> > >
> > > If second issue has no impact on performance, we can take perf results
> from rc.-1 and run only functional tests for rc.0.
> > >
> > > On 2021/07/22 04:44:01, "Николай Ижиков" <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > +1 to fix both prior to release
> > > >
> > > > Отправлено с iPhone
> > > >
> > > > > 22 июля 2021 г., в 02:36, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
> написал(а):
> > > > >
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > We've faced [1][2] issues related to the new functionality added to
> > > > > the 2.11 release (it will be safe to merge to the release branch).
> > > > > From my point of view, both of them are critical and must be
> included
> > > > > in the 2.11 release.
> > > > > The [2] is ready for merge. The [1] will be completed by the end
> of this week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please share your thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15146
> > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 15:08, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Folks,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Since the release branch was created some time ago, should we
> bump up
> > > > >> the master branch version to the next one?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 17:15, Alexey Gidaspov <
> olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi, Pavel.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I think, it looks like blocker. Please cherry-pick it to 2.11
> release branch
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 2021/07/01 09:29:57, Pavel Pereslegin <xxt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>> Hello, Alexey!
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Is it possible to include a hotfix that corrects the command
> syntax
> > > > >>>> output in the control script? [1]
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> This bug can significantly complicate the use of the snapshot
> restore
> > > > >>>> function (one of the important features of 2.11). In addition,
> this
> > > > >>>> may raise a number of questions to the product support, which
> we can
> > > > >>>> prevent by adding this patch in 2.11.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> This patch does not affect any functions other than the "help"
> output
> > > > >>>> of the control script.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14989
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 11:56, Alexey Gidaspov <
> olive.c...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Hi, Iilya!
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> As I can see, this feature highly improves debugging during
> incidents. So I think we can call it blocker and cherry-pick to ignite-2.11
> branch
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On 2021/06/30 20:26:43, Shishkov Ilya <shishkovi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> Hello, Alexey!
> > > > >>>>>> Is it possible to add system views for BaselineNode
> attributes [1] and
> > > > >>>>>> corresponding documentation [2] to 2.11?
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15007
> > > > >>>>>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15028
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 11:07, Nikita Amelchev <
> namelc...@apache.org>:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Thanks! I have cherry-picked the commit to the 2.11 branch.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 11:00, Alexey Gidaspov <
> olive.c...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Hi, Nikita!
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> I think it's important fix and should be included in 2.11
> release. I've
> > > > >>>>>>> tagged ticket by fixVersion 2.11. Can you cherry-pick it to
> ignite-2.11
> > > > >>>>>>> branch? And please fill release notes or delete flag.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> On 2021/06/30 07:55:04, Nikita Amelchev <
> namelc...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hello, Alexey.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> I suggest adding to the 2.11 scope the resolved issue [1].
> It fixes
> > > > >>>>>>>>> incorrect values of cache, cache groups, data region
> metrics after
> > > > >>>>>>>>> cluster reactivation.
> > > > >>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14990
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> вт, 29 июн. 2021 г. в 15:09, Alexey Gidaspov <
> olive.c...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ok, we can add this fix to release scope.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/29 08:36:00, Сурков Александр
> > > > >>>>>>> Викторович<surkov.a....@sberbank.ru.INVALID> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alexey.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I think need add ticket: JmxMetricExporter fails to
> export
> > > > >>>>>>> discovery metrics -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14376
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/15 14:43:55, Alexey Gidaspov <o...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite 2.11 Code Freeze started now>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Best wishes,
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Amelchev Nikita
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>> Best wishes,
> > > > >>>>>>> Amelchev Nikita
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > >
>

Reply via email to