Val,

Would you like me to start the discussion about sync-over-async in Ignite 3
Java APIs, or do you plan to do it yourself?

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 10:10 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Makes sense, thanks!
>
> -Val
>
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 2:00 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Val,
> >
> > This is a very good point.
> >
> > I've looked around blogs, docs, and system APIs, and updated the IEP
> > accordingly:
> > For Ignite.NET I propose NOT to add sync methods when the actual
> > implementation is async:
> > - It is easy to consume async APIs in C# with async/await keywords (added
> > in 2012 and widely adopted)
> > - Most codebases are fully async anyway
> > - System APIs and popular libraries follow this direction
> > - Sync-over-async is misleading and can affect performance
> >
> >
> > However, I'm not so sure about Java, where async/await are not present,
> > overall async usage seems to be rarer, and removing sync methods may
> become
> > an obstacle for the users in some cases.
> > Let's create a separate discussion and see what others think.
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:32 PM Valentin Kulichenko <
> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pavel,
> > >
> > > I've looked at the IEP and the public API - looks good to me.
> > >
> > > Quick question - do you plan to add sync methods to the interfaces, or
> > > you're thinking to only leave async? If the latter, what are the
> > arguments
> > > for this? The reason I'm asking is that I'm actually thinking about
> > > suggesting the same for Java as well (or at least having a discussion
> > about
> > > this).
> > >
> > > -Val
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 10:08 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Igniters,
> > > >
> > > > Please review the IEP [1] and the PoC [2] for .NET Thin Client in
> > Ignite
> > > > 3.0.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-78+.NET+Thin+Client
> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite-3/pull/306
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to