I've checked Guava's feature list and came to a conclusion it's usefulness has been diminished by switching to base java 11.
-1 for general use, but we can use some code parts then needed. ср, 8 сент. 2021 г. в 14:09, Вячеслав Коптилин <slava.kopti...@gmail.com>: > -1 > I am leaning toward -1 because of vulnerability issues (that is a possible > case in general). > > Thanks, > S. > > ср, 8 сент. 2021 г. в 12:13, Andrey Mashenkov <andrey.mashen...@gmail.com > >: > > > -1 > > Supporting few copy-pasted methods is much easier than support > dependencies > > compatibility. > > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:42 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky > > <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > Aleksandr, thanks for this activity. > > > -1 from my side, all my decisions are in linked discussion. > > > > > > >Dear Igniters, > > > > > > > >In this thread > > > >< > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4120a03a2bf32098e54e21ae02e509b0d68f413bc7cc1f8f6d85c93d%40%3Cdev.ignite.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > >we've been discussing the problems and opportunities of using Guava > > > >< https://github.com/google/guava > in Ignite 3. We have agreed that > it > > > >should be added as a shaded dependency, but we haven't decided whether > > to > > > >allow using Guava methods in the Ignite codebase or not. Therefore I > > would > > > >like to propose a vote: > > > > > > > >[+1 Allow]: allow using Guava methods, if justified. > > > >[-1 Prohibit]: prohibit using all Guava methods. > > > > > > > >The voting will commence on Monday, September 13th at 9:00 UTC. Also > > feel > > > >free to express your opinion in the original discussion thread. > > > > > > > >-- > > > >With regards, > > > >Aleksandr Polovtcev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Andrey V. Mashenkov > > > -- Best regards, Alexei Scherbakov
