Hello! Maybe I am wrong, but ODBC installer is built from source and may be improved from release to release.
Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пн, 6 дек. 2021 г. в 20:41, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: > Only one reason -- nowadays amost all hardware platforms uses NUMA > > Another reason -- there is no any release process of extensions. > > > BTW, apache ignite release is shipped with odbc binary installer for > windows. And nobody complains about it. > > But may be listen to others? > > пн, 6 дек. 2021 г., 19:49 Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > > > Any reason to release the same cpp sources for each release? > > Any reason to increase the requirements amount for each new release? > > Any reason to increase release complexity and duration? > > All answers are "definitely no" > > > > What we should do is to release cpp part once and use it as a dependency. > > Extensions are a good location. > > > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:11 PM Zhenya Stanilovsky > > <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 with Ivan, let`s store it in core product just because it looks > > > like inalienable functionality and release cycle of extensions a little > > bit > > > different. > > > > > > > > > > > > >Anton, I disagree. > > > > > > > >1. This should be released with main distro. > > > >2. This should not be abandoned. > > > >3. There is not any release process in ignite-extensions. > > > >4. Everything is working now and working good. > > > > > > > > > > > >So lets do not do this :) > > > > > > > >пн, 6 дек. 2021 г. в 14:49, Anton Vinogradov < a...@apache.org >: > > > > > > > >> Let's move all GCC-related parts to ignite-extensions, release, and > > use > > > >> them as a maven dependency. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:08 PM Ivan Daschinsky < > ivanda...@gmail.com > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Ok, TC suite is ready [1]. > > > >> > If there is no objections, I will merge it soon. > > > >> > > > > >> > Possible concerns -- now it is required to install > build-essentials > > > and > > > >> > libnuma-dev in order to build ignite on 64 bit linux. > > > >> > I suppose that this is not a big deal, but maybe someone will > > > contradict? > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > [1] -- > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_NumaAllocator/?mode=builds > > > >> > > > > >> > чт, 2 дек. 2021 г. в 12:03, Ivan Daschinsky < ivanda...@gmail.com > > >: > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> Our runs show about 7-10 speedup, > > > >> > > Sorry, typo 7-10% speedup > > > >> > > > > > >> > > чт, 2 дек. 2021 г. в 12:01, Ivan Daschinsky < > ivanda...@gmail.com > > > >: > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> Andrey, thanks! > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> This allocator can be tested on every NUMA system. > > > >> > >> Our runs show about 7-10 speedup, if we use allocattor with > > > >> interleaved > > > >> > >> strategy + -XX:+UseNUMA. > > > >> > >> But unfortunately our yardstick benches doesn't use offheap a > > lot, > > > >> > >> usually above one Gb. > > > >> > >> We trying to do more benches with real data and share them, > > > possibly > > > >> in > > > >> > >> meetup. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> AFAIK, GG lab servers are two-sockets machines, aren't they? So > > it > > > is > > > >> > >> worth to run benches with a lot data on them, using > > > >> > >> allocator with interleaved strategy (you can skip specifying > numa > > > >> nodes, > > > >> > >> by default it will use all available) and use -XX:+UseNUMA jvm > > > >> > >> flag. > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> чт, 2 дек. 2021 г. в 11:48, Andrey Mashenkov < > > > >> > andrey.mashen...@gmail.com > > > >> > >> >: > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >>> Ivan, > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Great job. PR looks good. > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> This allocator in interleaved mode and passing `-XX:+UseNUMA` > > > flag to > > > >> > jvm > > > >> > >>> > show promising results on yardstick benches. Technically, G1 > > is > > > >> not a > > > >> > >>> numa > > > >> > >>> > aware collector for java versions less than 14, but > allocation > > > of > > > >> > heap > > > >> > >>> in > > > >> > >>> > interleaved mode shows good results even on java 11. > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> Can you share benchmark results? > > > >> > >>> I'm not sure I'll have an Optane on my notebook in a > reasonable > > > time > > > >> ;) > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 10:41 AM Ivan Daschinsky < > > > ivanda...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > > >> > >>> wrote: > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > Semyon D. and Maks T. -- thanks a lot for review. > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > BTW, Igniters, I will appreciate all opinions and feedback. > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > пн, 29 нояб. 2021 г. в 10:13, Ivan Daschinsky < > > > >> ivanda...@apache.org > > > >> > >: > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > Hi, igniters! > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > There is not a big secret that nowadays NUMA is quite > common > > > in > > > >> > >>> > > multiprocessor systems. > > > >> > >>> > > And this memory architecture should be treated in specific > > > ways. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > Support for NUMA is present in many commercial and > > open-source > > > >> > >>> products. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > I've implemented a NUMA aware allocator for Apache Ignite > > [1] > > > >> > >>> > > It is a JNI wrapper around `libnuma` and supports > different > > > >> > >>> allocation > > > >> > >>> > > options. > > > >> > >>> > > I.e. interleaved, local, interleved_mask and so on. For > more > > > >> > >>> information, > > > >> > >>> > > see > > > >> > >>> > > [2], [3]. > > > >> > >>> > > This allocator in interleaved mode and passing > > `-XX:+UseNUMA` > > > >> flag > > > >> > >>> to jvm > > > >> > >>> > > show promising results on yardstick benches. Technically, > G1 > > > is > > > >> > not a > > > >> > >>> > numa > > > >> > >>> > > aware collector for java versions less than 14, but > > > allocation of > > > >> > >>> heap in > > > >> > >>> > > interleaved mode shows good results even on java 11. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > Currently, all needed libraries and tools for building > this > > > >> module > > > >> > >>> are > > > >> > >>> > > available on TC agents > > > >> > >>> > > setup of specific test suite is in progress [4] > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > So I am asking for a review of my patch. > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > [1] -- > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15922 > > > >> > >>> > > [2] -- https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/numa.3.html > > > >> > >>> > > [3] -- > https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/mbind.2.html > > > >> > >>> > > [4] -- > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15994 > > > >> > >>> > > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > -- > > > >> > >>> > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > > > >> > >>> > > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >>> -- > > > >> > >>> Best regards, > > > >> > >>> Andrey V. Mashenkov > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> -- > > > >> > >> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -- > > > >> > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
