As for me, I believe that this should be removed. We have already proven binary protocol that is under heavy use.
ср, 9 февр. 2022 г. в 15:11, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > Hello, > > From my point of view, it's better to reduce the scope of features to > be supported and focus on those ones that a really important for > production e.g. Calcite for Ignite 2.x. However, talking in terms of > open-source development it's better to find a volunteer who will fix > all the issues you describe. > > On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 14:27, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Igniters, I'd like to discuss the future of this functionality in Apache > > Ignite > > > > Today this functionality seems to be unusable > > 1. It is limited (especially redis) > > 2. It doesn't support HA (redis sentinel or redis cluster) > > 3. Nobody maintains it and even nobody fixes bugs. (i.e. [1] is not > merged > > for years). > > > > If we want to support redis protocol, we should rewrite it and add HA > > features. > > Otherwise, I suppose that we should consider complete removal of this > code > > from codebase. > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > [1] -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7153 > -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
