Hello Igniters. I see that the main argument against Micronaut is that we need Micronaut+Swagger to achieve IEP 87 if we can use only Swagger. I agree this is a valid point and logically. But I think we can take a look into it from another side, from future vision. Main idea to start using micronaut to simplify code writing in future just because Micronaut Framework really helps to develop REST services in practice. For example, I think it's obvious that Ignite will need to implement some authentication mechanism and Micronaut can help to achieve it [1]. Moreover Micronaut is based on the same technology which is currently used in Ignite, I mean Netty. It means that we should speak only about vulnerabilities inside of Micronaut implementation, but the Micronaut project has a very big community and a lot of clients. In context of it I would say that bugs and vulnerabilities in Micronaut implementation will be found more quickly than in internal Ignite implementation with pure Netty. Another point about cloud native support [2] which also can be useful in the context of Ignite.
[1] https://micronaut-projects.github.io/micronaut-security/latest/guide/ [2] https://objectcomputing.com/expertise/cloud-engineering On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 6:45 PM Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org> wrote: > Why couldn't the handlers be annotated? > > I think Kirill Gusakov (as the feature contributor) can give some > ideas about what and how should be annotated. This may require some > tweaking. > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 6:06 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov <apk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > Yes, swagger allows to annotate classes > > and then the spec will be generated. But > > here is a question. What classes should we > > annotade? > > > > Web framework brings the convention about > > how to write an endpoint and what to annotate. > > Our own REST server implementation does not. > > It is just the number of handlers. > > > > > On 25 May 2022, at 17:46, Alexander Polovtcev <alexpolovt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Aleksandr, > > > > > > Can we use these annotations without the micronaut dependencies? If > yes, > > > why do we need micronaut at all? > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 5:34 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov <apk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Yes, swagger-core has its own set of annotations [1] > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/wiki/Swagger-2.X---Annotations#quick-annotation-overview > > >> > > >>> On 23 May 2022, at 12:37, Alexander Polovtcev < > alexpolovt...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I'm not that scared of having a big library, I just believe that it > might > > >>> be possible to avoid using it altogether. Don't swagger generators > have > > >>> their own annotations? > > >> > > >> > > > > > >
