No, I'm talking about the protocol described here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-67%3A+Networking+module#IEP67:Networkingmodule-UserObjectSerialization

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 6:47 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov <apk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the question, Aleksandr. Can you clarify what do you mean by
> existing User Object Serialization protocol? Am I right assuming that you
> are talking about Mappers that are supported in Record and KV APIs?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Aleksandr Pakhomov
>
> > On 11 Jul 2024, at 18:39, Aleksandr Polovtsev <alexpolovt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Aleksandr, thank you for the great effort!
> >
> > Could you please explain how this protocol differs from the existing
> User Object Serialization protocol? Why do we need another one?
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 6:20 PM Aleksandr Pakhomov <apk...@gmail.com
> <mailto:apk...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> Hi, dear community.
> >>
> >> I would like to propose the design for supporting user objects in
> >> Ignite 3. All APIs that can accept/return custom objects that are
> >> not a part of Ignite 3 distribution are going to have additional
> >> parameter -- argument/result marshaller.
> >>
> >> I would appreciate any feedback, feel free to reply to this
> >> message or leave the comment in the Confluence.
> >>
> >> IEP-124: User Object Serialization - Apache Ignite - Apache Software
> Foundation
> >> cwiki.apache.org
> >>
> >>  <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-124%3A+User+Object+Serialization>IEP-124:
> User Object Serialization - Apache Ignite - Apache Software Foundation <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-124%3A+User+Object+Serialization
> >
> >> cwiki.apache.org <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-124%3A+User+Object+Serialization>
>   <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-124%3A+User+Object+Serialization
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Aleksandr Pakhomov
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > With regards,
> > Aleksandr Polovtsev
>
>

-- 
With regards,
Aleksandr Polovtsev

Reply via email to