On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:04PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 25.03.2015 21:30, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 25.03.2015 20:35, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 25.03.2015 20:11, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 25.03.2015 19:07, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > >>>>>> Brane, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The wrong download checksum issue has been addressed (I think). Please > >>>>>> double check me. The reason it happened was that I had two identical > >>>>>> folders with different names sitting next to each other and grabbed the > >>>>>> wrong one. The only difference was the name of the archive. (I should > >>>>>> really stop working after midnight :) > >>>>> Should be publishing exactly what was voted on, not even re-zipping, > >>>>> IMO. This is one of the reasons why it's a good idea to have the whole > >>>>> release process scripted; no manual archiving, copying, etc. anywhere. > >>>>> > >>>> This should be the case now. > >>> Out of interest, where do the Google Analytics reports go to? How can a > >>> lowly mentor have a look at the stats? > >>> > >> I have been reusing the GridGain one (mainly out of laziness). We should > >> setup the one for Ignite. I will work on it. > > Heh. You used the same element 'id' attribute twice on the download > > page; that's not valid HTML :) > > > > I'm fixing this ... > > OK, the downloads page now points people at mirrors. Note that no all > mirrors are currently up-to-date; there's been less than 24 hours since > the last change on the site. That'll fix itself in due time. > > The magic that's happening here is as follows: > > * The 'Download' link points to the file 'downloads.html' > * This file causes the SSI module to execute download.cgi > * download.cgi finds the closest mirror, parses download.html, > interpolates the mirror info there and returns the new contents > in-place. > > > FWI, some of the links in the footer are broken.
As a future UX improvement you might consider adding 'Releases' section, so visitors are clearly aware that there're official releases blessed by Apache and intermittent dev-snapshots or something. Would it make sense? Cos
