Another topic that I'd like to address before this gets into the final release. During the voting on RC3 (or even before) we have discussed that bundling LGPL libs is a bad idea as it really _changes_ the distribution license for the artifacts. Yet, I see that RC3 is (and perhaps 1.0 will be as well) including some LGPL and EPL bits (Hibernate is one of the examples).
I think those shouldn't be a part of binaries posted on ASF dist. As an alternative, anyone providing their own binary archives can do it from their own servers. It would be a good practice though to warn users of what they are getting into using the binaries under the aforementioned licenses. Am I making any sense? Thanks, Cos On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:13PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Guys, to start with: > - the format of md5 and sha1 files aren't Unix formats. It suppose to be > > hash file-name > > e.g. > > % md5sum /etc/hosts > aa2af9fea577aaedb79056917a6453a9 /etc/hosts > > % sha1sum /etc/hosts > ee5a6f3e4a3c109114d236c90ca382397fb998fe /etc/hosts > > When sum-files have this format you can do things like > % md5sum -c file-name.md5 > > and get your file validated automatically. Let's fix it, please. > > Cos > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 02:07PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > I have uploaded the new RC3 release candidate to: > > http://people.apache.org/~dsetrakyan/incubator-ignite-1.0.0/ > > > > The following changes were made based on all the feedback I got for RC3: > > > > 1. Fixed jdk8.backport wrong license issue. > > 2. Fixed NOTICE.txt according to comments from IPMC. > > 3. Fixed LICENSE.txt according to comments from IPMC. > > > > To build a binary release from source run: > > mvn clean package -DskipTests > > > > Instructions on how to run RAT and how to build the project are available > > in DEVNOTES.txt file. > > > > Please start voting. > > > > +1 - to accept Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0.0 > > 0 - don't care either way > > -1 - DO NOT accept Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0.0 (explain why) > > > > D.
