+1
Checksums are ok
Signature is ok
Release tree produces binaries without optional LGPL libs
Have filed for the following bug (doesn't appear to be a blocker?)
IGNITE-650. ignitevisorcmd fails with NoClassDefFoundError
Cos
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 06:40PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> (restarting a new vote for 1.0.0 after fixing the default build not to
> include LGPL libs)
>
> I have uploaded the new 1.0.0 release candidate to:
> http://people.apache.org/~dsetrakyan/incubator-ignite-1.0.0/
>
> The following changes were made based on all the feedback I got for RC3:
>
> 1. Added the ability to build a binary ZIP file without LGPL dependencies
> by default.
> 2. Fixed jdk8.backport wrong license issue.
> 3. Fixed NOTICE.txt according to comments from IPMC.
> 4. Fixed LICENSE.txt according to comments from IPMC.
>
> To build a binary release from source run:
>
> # Without LGPL dependencies
> mvn clean package -DskipTests
>
> # With LGPL dependencies
> mvn clean package -DskipTests -Prelease,lgpl
>
>
> Instructions on how to run RAT and how to build the project are available
> in DEVNOTES.txt file.
>
> Please start voting.
>
> +1 - to accept Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0.0
> 0 - don't care either way
> -1 - DO NOT accept Apache Ignite (incubating) 1.0.0 (explain why)
