I thought that we enforce JDK 7 because of our java8 backported classes. But now we reworked code to solve this issue. May be we do not need any more such restriction?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:26PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Shouldn't we be able to compile with Java8 as well? > > > > > > > Ideally, yes. But from what I heard, it requires additional work. > > Curious. The forward transition should be straigh-forward, but I guess it > is > possible to create some forward-incompatible code. If that's the case then > an > enforcer check for 1.7 would be a good idea. > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:08PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > I thought we added a requirement to make sure that maven build > requires > > > JDK > > > > 1.7. But if I build with JDK 1.8 I get only compilation errors > without > > > any > > > > explanation why. > > > > > > > > Can someone comment on that, please? > > > > > > > > D. > > > > -- Alexey Kuznetsov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com
