On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 09:01AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 19.04.2015 00:57, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Ognen Duzlevski <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have noticed that with 1.0.0-incubating there is somewhat of a delay with > >> "joining" an ignite cluster. I have 6 EC2 instances - I start ignite.sh > >> examples/configs/example-ignite.sh & and then move on the next instance. > >> The same command on the next instance takes about 5-10 seconds before it > >> returns and each additional instance seems to take even longer. Anyone else > >> notice this? > >> > >> > > You should not be getting such pauses. What OS are you running on? > > > > > >> I get this when I run ingnite.sh (1.0.0-incubating): > >> [15:22:31] Topology snapshot [ver=3, nodes=3, CPUs=24, heap=3.0GB] > >> [15:22:32] New version is available at ignite.incubator.apache.org: 1.0.2 > >> > >> Where is 1.0.2 available for downloads? All I see is 1.0.0-incubating. > >> > > You can download it here: http://www.gridgain.com/download/editions/ > > HUH?? Excuse me, is Ignite looking at GridGain's site for version > updates? How on earth can GridGain be offering versions of Ignite that > have not been released, and worse, how can you possibly call the package
Brane, I believe we have agreed that if anyone wants to offer their own builds of Ignite - it is ok, until they are not confused with official Apache releases of Ignite? If so, then someone moving at the different pace than Ignite can put binaries for uploads and call it a dev snapshot or community edition or whatever, no? Just trying to make sure we're on the same page. > 'gridgain-ignite'? There's no such thing. > > Really, I thought we had the brand dilution and trademark violation > questions sorted out. That's a bad idea, indeed! There shouldn't be such thing as Foo Ignite, where Foo != Apache. That's a clear contradiction to TM policy. Regards, Cos
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
