On 01.06.2015 18:06, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Nikita Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Generally, I'd vote for 2.11 not because of any language features but >> because of stability (and tooling around). 2.11 is very stable (comparing >> to 2.10). >> > If we go with 2.11, how do we make it work with Spark which runs on Scala > 2.10?
Teach Spark to use Scala 2.11, of course. I find it inconceivable that minor Scala versions are incompatible to this extent. Looks like a major fail to me ... but not that uncommon, notice that Ruby has the same lack of backward compatibility. -- Brane
