I think it is the standard structure to be followed and given that many open source projects follow it, we can safely assume that we will be stable on it. On 7 Jun 2015 19:46, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> How do we reach consensus without a vote? I thought vote will encourage > everyone to participate and provide opinion. > > I can cancel the vote, but so far I have heard no objections to the newly > proposed structure. Does it mean we have a consensus? > > D. > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 07.06.2015 15:50, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > > > Let's have a vote on the GIT structure proposed by the community > (mainly > > > Brane and Cos). > > > > Stop right there. Voting makes no sense at all. Discuss and reach > > consensus instead. > > > > Voting should never be used as a decision-making tool; it's an > > indication that the community can't agree on anything and resorts to > > majority rule instead of consensus rule. > > > > -- Brane > > > > >
