Hi Atri,

Yes, we are solved just change String on Object.

This changes were pushed at sprint-7. You can see it now. I will close the
ticket.

Thanks for your contribution!

-- Artem --

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Have we reached a conclusion for this please?
> On 26 Jun 2015 00:09, "Atri Sharma" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If it's ok I can upload patch for it tomorrow
> > On 25 Jun 2015 23:52, "Atri Sharma" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> I had that thought too since AttributeFilter's behaviour works with
> >> Objects itself and not any specific datatype so it should be simple
> matter
> >> of changing current function's datatype to Object but thought not to
> >> disturb the existing function.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Artiom Shutak <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Igniters,
> >>>
> >>> I've looked at patch. It is consistent with ticket description.
> >>>
> >>> But I see a problem with described in the task approach. From the task:
> >>>
> >>> Node attribute value can be an object of any type, but
> >>> > ClusterGroup.forAttribute(..) method accepts only string as a value.
> >>> > Need to add new public ClusterGroup forAttribute(String name,
> @Nullable
> >>> > Object val) method and deprecate the existing one
> >>>
> >>> In this case, all users who use forAttributes before will get
> deprecated
> >>> usages and will not be able to do anything with it (Actually all users,
> >>> which will try to use forAttribute with String or null).
> >>>
> >>> I suggest just change type of value from String to Object and it will
> be
> >>> all fix.
> >>>
> >>> Valentin, as soon as the ticket was created by you, do you have any
> >>> objections?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- Artem --
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Atri Sharma <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Thank you so much!
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Artiom Shutak <[email protected]
> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Atri, I will look at your patch at a couple of days.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -- Artem --
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Atri Sharma <[email protected]>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Patch is available.
> >>> > > > Please seen and let me know your comments.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Atri Sharma <
> [email protected]
> >>> >
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > Thanks,
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > That is what I was intending to do actually, sorry if it didn't
> >>> come
> >>> > > > > across clearly.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > I will work on the ticket and ask if I have any questions.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Thanks Brane, Dmitriy!
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> >>> > > > [email protected]
> >>> > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >> Agree with Brane, no need to ask. However, if you would like
> to
> >>> let
> >>> > us
> >>> > > > >> know
> >>> > > > >> that you have grabbed that ticket or have any questions, this
> >>> dev
> >>> > list
> >>> > > > is
> >>> > > > >> a
> >>> > > > >> good place for it.
> >>> > > > >>
> >>> > > > >> D.
> >>> > > > >>
> >>> > > > >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Branko Čibej <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > >>
> >>> > > > >> > On 18.06.2015 19:36, Atri Sharma wrote:
> >>> > > > >> > > Folks,
> >>> > > > >> > >
> >>> > > > >> > > Would like to take 1017. Please confirm if I can go ahead
> >>> and
> >>> > > advise
> >>> > > > >> on
> >>> > > > >> > > implementation.
> >>> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > >> > You really don't have to ask, just go ahead, grab the issue
> >>> and
> >>> > > start
> >>> > > > >> > coding.
> >>> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > >> > -- Brane
> >>> > > > >> >
> >>> > > > >>
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > --
> >>> > > > > Regards,
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Atri
> >>> > > > > *l'apprenant*
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > --
> >>> > > > Regards,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Atri
> >>> > > > *l'apprenant*
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Regards,
> >>> >
> >>> > Atri
> >>> > *l'apprenant*
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Atri
> >> *l'apprenant*
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to