I don't want to second-guess the Tomcat community. But considering they went through all IP-clearance, etc. I'd say let's change the dependencies to use the Tomcat's version of the artifacts. Can we?
Cos On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:55AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: > Cos, Brane, > > Do you have any idea here? It looks like Tomcat has the whole Servlet API > source code imported and licensed under Apache: > > https://github.com/apache/tomcat/tree/trunk/java/javax/servlet > > D. > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:11 AM, Anton Vinogradov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > As Justin said we have dependency on javax.servlet-api-3.0.1 (CDDL + > > GPLv2). As far as I understang we can not ptovide this artifact as a part > > of Ignite binary distribution. > > But I found that Apache Tomcat have same (javax.servlet.*) classes under > > Apache licence (for example - > > > > https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/javax/servlet/AsyncContext.java > > ). > > Is there any chances to use these classes at Ignite? > > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > We have a nighly build going on builds.apache.org. It should be easy to > > > add > > > one to do the release's convenience binaries there as well. Thoughts? > > > > > > Cos > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 07:18PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > > On 26.06.2015 14:52, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > > > > > Brane, mvn clean package does this. The process is covered in > > > DEVNOTES.txt > > > > > > > > > > Is that what you ask about? > > > > > > > > No, I'm asking where (on which machine) this is done. Ideally, these > > > > convenience binaries should be build on controlled ASF infrastructure, > > > > not on some random (possibly infected) developer's laptop. > > > > > > > > -- Brane > > > > > > > > > 2015-06-26 9:33 GMT+03:00 Branko Čibej <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > >> On 22.06.2015 12:20, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > > > > >>> Guys, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> ignite-1.2.0-incubating-rc2 has been accepted with 7 votes (2 > > > binding). > > > > >>> Thanks to those who voted: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> - Gianfranco > > > > >>> - Sergi > > > > >>> - Branko (binding) > > > > >>> - Alexey Goncharuk > > > > >>> - Valentin > > > > >>> - Semyon > > > > >>> - Konstantin Boudnik (binding) > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I will start vote on general list shortly. > > > > >> By the way, and before we get hammered about this on general@: > > Where > > > are > > > > >> the 'convenience binaries' for Ignite releases being built? Even if > > > > >> they're not official, they should be built on controlled hardware > > and > > > > >> the release process doc should contain instructions for building > > them. > > > > >> > > > > >> -- Brane > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
