+1 On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Nikolay Tikhonov <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, are we only using MD5 and SHA1 for checksums? > > > > If that is the case, can we try CRC? Much easier to port and easier to > > compute > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I think we should just stop using MD5 Hash and just keep using SHA1. In > > my > > > experience, the MD5 format is different on different operating systems, > > > while the SHA1 works the same in most of the cases. > > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'll take a look. Thanks, Brane! > > > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > > > 2015-07-13 11:27 GMT+03:00 Branko Čibej <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > On 12.07.2015 08:18, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > > > > On 11.07.2015 02:00, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > > > > >> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 01:56AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: > > > > > >>> Dear Sirs! > > > > > >> If you're trying to please IPMC gramma-busybodies with this - > > don't > > > > > bother: > > > > > >> they will find a reason why that isn't an appropriate way to > > address > > > > > them ;) > > > > > > I'm more interested in why 1.3.0-rc1 is still in dist/dev. You > > should > > > > > > really immediately delete packages that aren't candidates for > > > release, > > > > > > anything else just creates confusion. > > > > > > > > > > Sigh. The SHA1 and MD5 file format is still wrong. Please either > look > > > it > > > > > up if you're faking the format, or use the correct tools to > generate > > > it. > > > > > > > > > > Specifically, there should be two spaces between the hash and the > > file > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > -- Brane > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Atri > > *l'apprenant* > > >
