On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Artem Shutak <ashu...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> And one more question. Is it mandatory to have possibility works via > patches if we will have pull-request way for contributions? > > I'd like to have only one approach. > Artem, if possible I would allow 2 approaches and document the 2 approaches on Wiki. One question, does a pull request automatically generate a Jira comment (see Spark, Camel)? > > -- Artem -- > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Artem Shutak <ashu...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > Igniters, > > > > I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1217. > > > > Currently, everyone can fork Mirror of Apache Ignite on GitHub ( > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ignite), works with own fork (create > > branches, commit, pull changes at fork) and then creates a pull-request > to > > Mirror of Apache Ignite on GitHub (all changes should be done in one > commit > > as in patch-way approach). Then test TC builds will triggered > > automatically. Results can be found by branch filtering by pattern > > <pull-request-number>/merge. "Merge" suffix here means pull-request > merged > > with master branch (if pull-request at master branch). > > > > Notes: > > > > 1. I tried to use TC plugin for github to see TC result at pull-request. > > But the plugin works in unexpected way and add comments not only to > > pull-requests. Example: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-ignite/commit/ae11e9b5aa9af4d0d58e2a16dd3a3331969961df#commitcomment-12635375 > > . > > Maybe someone had this problem before? > > > > 2. I'm looking for a simple way to add information about new pull-request > > to associated jira. > > The better way to use existing Jira plugin for it - DVCS plugin ( > > > https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/BITBUCKET/Linking+Bitbucket+and+GitHub+accounts+to+JIRA > ). > > But I need both: Jira administration rights to configure the plugin and > > GitHub password for "apache" user. Or I missed something and we can't use > > this plugin at Apache infrastructure? > > Maybe someone can suggest another solution? > > > > Thanks, > > Artem. > > >