Yes, that's how I've usually done it. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:16 PM, David Knupp <dkn...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Seems like a silly question, but I just want to make sure I do this right. > > IMPALA-6239 was filed because the patch for IMPALA-6068 introduced a > regression. As a result, the patch was reverted: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-impala/commit/d1c9510 > > Presumably, I should now just resolve IMPALA-6239 and reopen > IMPALA-6068with a pointer to the reverted commit? > > -- > David Knupp | Software Engineer > Cloudera Inc., 433 California Street #1100. San Francisco, CA 94104 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=433+California+Street+%231100.+San+Francisco,+CA+94104&entry=gmail&source=g> > > <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=si > glink&utm_campaign=reach> >
