I don't appear to have the permission to create the branch:

Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: You are not authorized to edit this repository.
remote:
To https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/impala.git
 ! [remote rejected] branch-2.11.0 -> branch-2.11.0 (pre-receive hook
declined)
error: failed to push some refs to '
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/impala.git'

Does anyone know how I can get those permissions?

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:45 PM Jim Apple <jbap...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> sgtm
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Thomas Tauber-Marshall <
> tmarsh...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > Now that the issues that were brought up here have gone in, I propose
> that
> > we branch 2.11 at:
> >
> > commit b4cf5f2174b338c097e42d43c32b494a6e0b46c0
> > Author: Thomas Tauber-Marshall <tmarsh...@cloudera.com>
> > Date:   Mon Dec 11 10:02:45 2017 -0800
> >
> >     IMPALA-6298: Skip test_profile_fragment_instances on local filesystem
> >
> > (minus IMPALA-5017)
> >
> > Of course, if there are additional fixes we think should be included,
> they
> > can be cherry-picked over.
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:30 PM Thomas Tauber-Marshall <
> > tmarsh...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So now that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6292 has gone
> > > in, and with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6286 in
> GVO, I
> > > think the last currently known blocker is
> > > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/8802/. Once that goes in I think we're
> > > good.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:07 PM Tim Armstrong <tarmstr...@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Actually it looks like we have a new blocker that Taras filed:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6292
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Tim Armstrong <
> tarmstr...@cloudera.com
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I think that makes sense. We'll have to go through the fix versions
> of
> > >> > recent JIRAs and make sure that they weren't set to 2.12 though.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Tauber-Marshall <
> > >> > tmarsh...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Since the response from the community has been good, and now that
> all
> > >> of
> > >> >> the blocker JIRAs targeted for 2.11 have been closed, I propose
> that
> > we
> > >> >> cut
> > >> >> the release at:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> commit a4916e6d5f5f3542100af791534bfaf9ed544720
> > >> >> Author: Michael Ho <k...@cloudera.com>
> > >> >> Date:   Tue Dec 5 23:01:00 2017 -0800
> > >> >>
> > >> >>     IMPALA-6281: Fix use-after-free in InitAuth()
> > >> >>
> > >> >> There are still a lot of open JIRAs
> > >> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-6225?jql=proje
> > >> >> ct%20%3D%20IMPALA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%
> > >> >> 20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20%22Target%20Version%
> > >> >> 22%20%3D%20%22Impala%202.11.0%22>
> > >> >> targeted at 2.11 at lower priorities, so it would be helpful if
> > people
> > >> >> could go through the ones assigned to them and make sure nothing
> > >> important
> > >> >> is being missed, otherwise we'll bulk update all of these to target
> > >> 2.12
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If there are no further concerns, I'll start testing at that
> commit,
> > >> and
> > >> >> if
> > >> >> all goes well create a release candidate and [VOTE] thread.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:12 PM Matthew Jacobs <mjac...@apache.org
> >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > +1
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Thanks, Thomas!
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:50 PM Michael Brown <
> mi...@cloudera.com>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > > +1
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Thomas Tauber-Marshall <
> > >> >> > > tmarsh...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > > Folks,
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > It has been over 2 months since we released Apache Impala
> > 2.10.0
> > >> and
> > >> >> > > there
> > >> >> > > > have been new feature improvements and a good number of bug
> > fixes
> > >> >> > checked
> > >> >> > > > in since then.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > I propose that we release 2.11.0 soon and I volunteer to be
> its
> > >> >> release
> > >> >> > > > manager. Please speak up and let the community know if anyone
> > has
> > >> >> any
> > >> >> > > > objections to this.
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> >> > > > Thomas
> > >> >> > > >
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > --
> > >> >> > Sent from My iPhone
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to