Hi friends,

It's time to move forward the branch-2.x. Though we've made great
features/improvements in Impala-3.x, people’s impression of Impala is still
in the 2.x era. Most of them still using Hadoop2 in production and have no
choices to try Impala-3.x. I believe Hadoop2 will still be used for some
years. It's a pity if we lose those users.

I'd like to have a try to move forward branch-2.x. Hopes you can give some
suggestions! There're two proposals I can come up with:
(a) Cherry-pick mature improvements/features into branch-2.x feature by
feature.
(b) Cherry-pick commits in branch-3.x one by one (skip those just for 3.x)

I summarize a "commits diff" between branch-3.x, branch-2.x and
cloudera/cdh-5.16.1-release:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12h1rTAPS1gm0vhlDGxeOXjnRD7rrOcoqzX4rjRRCyBg

It shows up that Cloudera release is doing in (a) and pick up few commits.
However, It does pick up some commits in batch from branch-3.x (e.g.
commits of LocalCatalog). I think it's a good example for (a).

However, (a) needs more efforts than (b). If we doing in way (b), we just
need to fix cherry-pick conflicts, run GVO and then merge the commit if the
tests are passed.

What do you think? Could anyone share some experience about how other
projects (e.g. Hadoop, Hive, HBase) manage several branches together?

Thanks,
Quanlong Huang

Reply via email to