+1, thanks for working on this!

On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:18 AM Jim Apple <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm in favor. Given the importance of remote reads, I would even be in
> favor of these if it DID extend the critical path.
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:41 AM Tim Armstrong <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > This is really about testing the dockerised minicluster, but gives us
> > coverage of remote read code paths for free, and more people care about
> > that right now.
> >
> > I got the core end-to-end tests passing locally as part of
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-7995. That change is up for
> > review here https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/12639/. The next step is to
> get
> > a
> > Jenkins job running, which I've been working on.
> >
> > I'd like to run it regularly so we can catch any regressions. Initially
> > I'll just have it email me when it fails, but after it's stable for a
> week
> > or two I'd like to make it part of the regular set of jobs.
> >
> > My preference is to run it as part of the precommit jobs, in parallel to
> > the Ubuntu 16.04 tests. It should not extend the critical path of
> precommit
> > because it only runs the end-to-end tests. We could alternatively run it
> as
> > a scheduled post-commit job, but that tends to create additional work
> when
> > it breaks.
> >
> > What do people think?
> >
> > - Tim
> >
>

Reply via email to