Makes sense to me. We should keep current users in mind and allow a graceful migration but don't see any reason why we need to stick with these terms.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:51 PM skyyws <sky...@163.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > > On 11/9/2020 23:00，Shant Hovsepian<sh...@superdupershant.com> wrote： > Hi All, > > Any thoughts on more inclusive terminology for some of our concepts? We > tend to use coordinator / worker as opposed to master / slave. There aren't > too many places where we use the term blacklist, but there are a few > pending features for faulty node and disk handling that might benefit from > a more inclusive adoption of terminology. > > How about using ban or allow lists going forward? We can consider adding an > alias for the flags blacklisted_dbs, blacklisted_tables, and > blacklisting_enabled. > > -Shant >
