The table being "blocked" is just my hypothesis, maybe I'm wrong? I can see
that when a REFRESH statement is running, issuing a simple "select * from
table limit 10" sits in "CREATED Query submitted" state until roughly when
the refresh statement finishes.
Just out of curiosity I launched a Trino cluster on the same servers as
Impala and hooked it up to the same Iceberg catalog, issuing an identical
"select * from table limit 10" runs in ~2 seconds, whereas in Impala it's
~2 minutes.

Here's the details for the select query execution:

Query Compilation: 1m14s
   - Metadata of all 2 tables cached: 42s528ms (42s528ms)
   - Analysis finished: 42s539ms (10.112ms)
   - Authorization finished (ranger): 42s540ms (1.246ms)
   - Value transfer graph computed: 42s540ms (609.596us)
   - Single node plan created: 1m13s (30s493ms)
   - Runtime filters computed: 1m13s (44.325us)
   - Distributed plan created: 1m13s (29.075us)
   - Parallel plans created: 1m13s (266.400us)
   - Planning finished: 1m14s (1s727ms)
Query Timeline: 2m13s
   - Query submitted: 50.627us (50.627us)
   - Planning finished: 1m27s (1m27s)
   - Submit for admission: 1m27s (273.383us)
   - Completed admission: 1m55s (28s320ms)
   - Ready to start on 121 backends: 1m55s (91.685ms)
   - All 121 execution backends (1921 fragment instances) started: 2m7s
(11s578ms)
   - Rows available: 2m7s (1.412ms)
   - First row fetched: 2m7s (291.051ms)
   - Last row fetched: 2m7s (225.054ms)
   - Released admission control resources: 2m13s (5s433ms)
   - Unregister query: 2m13s (100.938ms)

Catalog Server Operation: 49s120ms
       - Got Metastore client: 3.116us (3.116us)
       - Got catalog version read lock: 2.250ms (2.247ms)
       - Got catalog version write lock and table write lock: 2.315ms
(65.074us)
       - Got Metastore client: 2.320ms (4.258us)
       - Fetched table from Metastore: 12.885ms (10.565ms)
       - Loaded Iceberg API table: 72.570ms (59.684ms)
       - Loaded schema from Iceberg: 72.751ms (181.127us)
       - Loaded Iceberg files: 7s925ms (7s852ms)
       - Loaded all column stats: 7s953ms (28.404ms)
       - Loaded table schema: 7s958ms (5.226ms)
       - Start refreshing file metadata: 7s959ms (431.115us)
       - Loaded file metadata for 1 partitions: 22s081ms (14s122ms)
       - Loaded all column stats: 49s120ms (27s038ms)
       - Loaded table: 49s120ms (30.027us)
       - Finished resetMetadata request: 49s120ms (312.849us)
Query Compilation: 53s727ms
       - Metadata of all 2 tables cached: 53s726ms (53s726ms)
       - Analysis finished: 53s726ms (67.048us)
       - Authorization finished (ranger): 53s727ms (422.569us)
       - Planning finished: 53s727ms (137.463us)
Query Timeline: 1m44s
       - Query submitted: 42.071us (42.071us)
       - Planning finished: 53s735ms (53s735ms)
       - CatalogDdlRequest finished: 1m42s (49s122ms)
       - Applied catalog updates from DDL: 1m43s (1s049ms)
       - Request finished: 1m43s (14.695ms)
       - Unregister query: 1m44s (912.626ms)

2025-01-09, kt, 12:33 Zoltán Borók-Nagy <borokna...@cloudera.com> rašė:

> Thanks for the update.
>
> So the whole REFRESH operation took 1m50s. From this CatalogDdlRequest was
> only 46s313ms. This 46s313ms is the time when the table is blocked, right?
> From CatalogDdlRequest the longest operation was loading column stats which
> took 27s300ms. This is a single RPC (getTableColumnStatistics()) toward
> HMS, it would be good to know why it took so long. Especially given that
> loading file metadata for this huge table was around 19 seconds.
> It's also interesting that "Loaded all column stats" appears twice in the
> catalog timeline. At first it took 11.697ms, and the second invocation was
> the one that took 27s300ms. Hopefully we can get rid of the second
> invocation but that'll require a code change.
>
> I also wonder why the table is not queryable from the Coordinator cache
> while it is being reloaded in CatalogD, I hope we can fix this as well.
>
> Is the table expected to grow indefinitely? Or do you drop/relocate old
> partitions after some time?
>
> Cheers,
>     Zoltan
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 9:19 PM Saulius Valatka <saulius...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > so I just tried applying IMPALA-13254 on top of 4.4.1, redeployed and
> > refresh times for the largest table went down from ~80 minutes to ~2
> > minutes!
> > That's waaay better, but still not ideal: if we issue a refresh every 15
> > minutes, there's still a lot of time the table is blocked for a minute or
> > two, but at least now it's queryable.
> >
> > Here's an example REFRESH timeline:
> >
> > Catalog Server Operation: 46s213ms
> >    - Got Metastore client: 5.771us (5.771us)
> >    - Got catalog version read lock: 2.334ms (2.328ms)
> >    - Got catalog version write lock and table write lock: 2.459ms
> > (125.470us)
> >    - Got Metastore client: 2.465ms (6.181us)
> >    - Fetched table from Metastore: 12.831ms (10.366ms)
> >    - Loaded Iceberg API table: 139.024ms (126.192ms)
> >    - Loaded schema from Iceberg: 139.175ms (150.949us)
> >    - Loaded Iceberg files: 5s036ms (4s897ms)
> >    - Loaded all column stats: 5s047ms (11.697ms)
> >    - Loaded table schema: 5s053ms (5.279ms)
> >    - Start refreshing file metadata: 5s053ms (291.959us)
> >    - Loaded file metadata for 1 partitions: 18s912ms (13s859ms)
> >    - Loaded all column stats: 46s213ms (27s300ms)
> >    - Loaded table: 46s213ms (36.600us)
> >    - Finished resetMetadata request: 46s213ms (485.329us)
> > Query Compilation: 1m3s
> >    - Metadata of all 2 tables cached: 1m3s (1m3s)
> >    - Analysis finished: 1m3s (237.705us)
> >    - Authorization finished (ranger): 1m3s (808.267us)
> >    - Planning finished: 1m3s (581.713us)
> > Query Timeline: 1m51s
> >    - Query submitted: 40.227us (40.227us)
> >    - Planning finished: 1m3s (1m3s)
> >    - CatalogDdlRequest finished: 1m50s (46s313ms)
> >    - Applied catalog updates from DDL: 1m50s (24.206ms)
> >    - Request finished: 1m50s (202.949us)
> >    - Unregister query: 1m51s (763.412ms)
> >
> >
> > 2025-01-08, tr, 17:50 Zoltán Borók-Nagy <borokna...@cloudera.com> rašė:
> >
> > > Thanks for the info, Saulius.
> > >
> > > If you try out IMPALA-13254, please let us know how much it helps in
> > > your case.
> > > Hopefully it speeds up table loading times enough so it won't cause too
> > > much turbulence.
> > > Some table loading statistics would be also helpful to know where the
> > time
> > > is being spent.
> > >
> > > Do you use local catalog mode?
> > > https://impala.apache.org/docs/build/html/topics/impala_metadata.html
> > > I'm not sure how much it will help, but it could be worth trying out.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >     Zoltan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 2:45 PM Saulius Valatka <saulius...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > sorry, maybe I worded my question wrong: I understand that refreshing
> > is
> > > > needed (either automatic or manual), main concerns are the latency of
> > the
> > > > refresh and the fact that the table is not queryable while it's being
> > > > refreshed - for large tables that are being updated frequently this
> > > > combination makes them essentially un-queryable.
> > > >
> > > > 2025-01-08, tr, 15:17 Gabor Kaszab <gaborkas...@apache.org> rašė:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't think that the issue you describe is specific to Iceberg
> in a
> > > > sense
> > > > > that even for Hive tables if you make changes using an engine that
> > > > doesn't
> > > > > trigger HMS events, one has to issue refresh/invalidate metadata to
> > see
> > > > the
> > > > > changes reflected in Impala.
> > > > > Could you share what catalog you use for your Iceberg tables? And
> > what
> > > > tool
> > > > > do you use for data ingestion into these tables?
> > > > > If you use the HMS backed HiveCatalog as a catalog and an engine
> that
> > > > > triggers HMS notifications, like Spark or Hive then even for
> Iceberg
> > > > tables
> > > > > you can avoid executing refresh manually.
> > > > >
> > > > > Gabor
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 1:48 PM Saulius Valatka <
> saulius...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I understand correctly, once an Iceberg table is mutated
> outside
> > > of
> > > > > > Impala one has to run a refresh or invalidate statement. We
> noticed
> > > > that
> > > > > > running refresh on huge tables can take minutes and while that is
> > > > > happening
> > > > > > querying them is blocked. We have large event tables that are
> being
> > > > > updated
> > > > > > very frequently in real-time, by default we run a refresh after
> > each
> > > > > > update, so effectively this means such tables are un-queryable,
> as
> > > > > they're
> > > > > > constantly being refreshed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there something I'm missing? What would the recommendation
> here
> > > be?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to